Re: [salud] Moving forward with the draft

Dale,

I think this is a good way to move forward. I will update the draft.

Thank you
Laura

2013/10/18 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>

> [as chair]
>
> It is my belief that we have resolved all outstanding issues with the
> draft, excepting as detailed below.
>
> The revised URN namespace definition has received no comments from the
> URN-NID mailing list.  I have been unable to contact Alfred Hoenes, so
> presumably we will hear no objections from him.
>
> The other issues that I've known about I have filed in the issue
> tracker.  The list can be found at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/salud/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=ticket
>
> I believe that all of these issues have been fixed and discussed on
> the mailing list, with the possible exception of #6, 'Better
> explanation of "delay"'
> (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/salud/trac/ticket/6).  But looking at
> section 3.1.6 and the changes to section 6.2.5
> (
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-07&url2=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-08
> ),
> I believe that that issue has been resolved as well.
>
> The only additional issue that I know of is that we haven't listed
> Alfred in the Acknowledgments section.
>
> If everyone agrees that there are no issues that I have not listed, I
> propose that we:
>
> - Produce a -09 version, listing Alfred in the Acknowledgments.
>
> - Proceed to WGLC
>
> - I search for a Document Shepherd to submit the draft to the IESG.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud
>