Re: [salud] Moving forward with the draft

Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> Sun, 20 October 2013 05:41 UTC

Return-Path: <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 215C511E8171 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:41:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YpB6M8YOwIpY for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:41:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x233.google.com (mail-lb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::233]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 450EE11E8356 for <salud@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f179.google.com with SMTP id p9so4409386lbv.38 for <salud@ietf.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=kAKGGWK30xFz+9YMWgS6PSyqbpfTCYjWudptb6TM7zM=; b=QA5YyKgtsFYR/A4Ik514lN7f+IQz1FrYTKKRfQ89Xu/sx5SnvztthtHGgIbW7y7fCX Wuk+CD+FhfJqyGpEdcOnD7HynyyQ5uuFTLi4kH6VPONQq59rOHwi0QYVjEHqzfUKjldd 6iAvw7Jbcps5EIxG5X1GTpAABFtpR66U7IWGPMpyMs5RjxUBKE35M5sA17OpAHiF0SC8 5KGv0ekB0cTx88mh93va1RYqkz1orGYQqePgVkfYze6yMJhwif/dWBrChd3gnSVgFTws k6Ybh/jcxOgMmIM5ZW4lhcPMk9rOpohYjO2uUujhiuxd1Y8oZAIVwPA8uQLWNNb4zncv TGgg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.0.173 with SMTP id 13mr8259338lbf.8.1382247712146; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.77.198 with HTTP; Sat, 19 Oct 2013 22:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201310182044.r9IKi3VM3219677@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <201310182044.r9IKi3VM3219677@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 07:41:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CACWXZj2YYqrKh5GJ++vDxW1dCKTmb9pj8p5Njq0Bj6r7kF9b5g@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d042c65a7dfcd6004e9259f00
Cc: "salud@ietf.org" <salud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [salud] Moving forward with the draft
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 05:41:59 -0000

Dale,

I think this is a good way to move forward. I will update the draft.

Thank you
Laura

2013/10/18 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>

> [as chair]
>
> It is my belief that we have resolved all outstanding issues with the
> draft, excepting as detailed below.
>
> The revised URN namespace definition has received no comments from the
> URN-NID mailing list.  I have been unable to contact Alfred Hoenes, so
> presumably we will hear no objections from him.
>
> The other issues that I've known about I have filed in the issue
> tracker.  The list can be found at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/salud/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=ticket
>
> I believe that all of these issues have been fixed and discussed on
> the mailing list, with the possible exception of #6, 'Better
> explanation of "delay"'
> (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/salud/trac/ticket/6).  But looking at
> section 3.1.6 and the changes to section 6.2.5
> (
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-07&url2=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-08
> ),
> I believe that that issue has been resolved as well.
>
> The only additional issue that I know of is that we haven't listed
> Alfred in the Acknowledgments section.
>
> If everyone agrees that there are no issues that I have not listed, I
> propose that we:
>
> - Produce a -09 version, listing Alfred in the Acknowledgments.
>
> - Proceed to WGLC
>
> - I search for a Document Shepherd to submit the draft to the IESG.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud
>