Re: [salud] Fwd: Christer's review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-09

Christer Holmberg <> Fri, 24 January 2014 14:43 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B39E1A0459 for <>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:43:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.239
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.239 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YZdCcdGM0rsW for <>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:42:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0433C1A03EF for <>; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 06:42:58 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb32-b7f4c8e0000012f5-96-52e27bf0612d
Received: from (Unknown_Domain []) by (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id AE.43.04853.0FB72E25; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:42:57 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.02.0387.000; Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:42:56 +0100
From: Christer Holmberg <>
To: Laura Liess <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: Fwd: [salud] Christer's review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-09
Thread-Index: AQHPGRKR9XIp0dQuj0Kb58e1d7zuMg==
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:42:56 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <>, <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_fuy2s9nth4wxbddowm0vaspg1390574577193emailandroidcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFrrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvje7H6kdBBt/vsFnMuWJocbfjAKMD k8fTCZPZPZYs+ckUwBTFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlfH96inWgnX+FQe3b2ZrYPzl3MXIySEhYCJx ZsoMZghbTOLCvfVsXYxcHEICJxgl7r5ewA7hLGGUmDZjA5DDwcEmYCHR/U8bpEFEIERi4q0T TCC2MJC9+OltVoh4qMTkg2dYIGw9iU0rb4MtYBFQlZhx+h9YnFfATeLshrdMEPNvMkpsWjIf rIhTIFBi6fzVbCA2I9BF30+tAVvALCAucevJfCaISwUkluw5D3W1qMTLx/9YIWpyJF5fncIE sUBQ4uTMJywTGIVnIWmfhaRsFpIyiLiBxPtz85khbG2JZQtfQ9n6Ehu/nGVEFl/AyL6KUbI4 tbg4N93IQC83PbdEL7UoM7m4OD9Przh1EyMwjg5u+W20g/HkHvtDjNIcLErivNdZa4KEBNIT S1KzU1MLUovii0pzUosPMTJxcEo1MApOm7Bxm9cMD06HT0euvRKace7Xk/ybNvp1K/LXt3np uvZXsxw2vyHv/yTmx9Qln3jMzwan6dkqWgYGeEyerltVfPfuRcs7jE6801Oal0evjvWyjXqx dEXs+wNNRTVNzn5bTl2fwmlr/syX80Xmxz9b+tKdrs0RU/4yT4ZXc6qXsyP/z6namUosxRmJ hlrMRcWJANwJAqRxAgAA
Subject: Re: [salud] Fwd: Christer's review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-09
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 14:43:01 -0000

Hi Laura,

I am ok with your answers. Go ahead and submit :)



Sent from my Sony Ericsson Xperia arc S

Laura Liess <> wrote:

Hi Christer,

Could you have a loook at my answers to your comments Q6 to Q9?  If you agree to them, I could publish the version -11 of the draft whch we could send then to the IESG.


Section 1.1 says:

“In [RFC3261] this is done by including a URI in the Alert-Info header field, that specifies the tone.”

Should the text say that the header field includes a REFERENCE to a tone? Later in the paragraph, you DO talk about the referenced tone.

[LL] Would you agree with the text   “In [RFC3261] this is done by including a URI in the Alert-Info header field, that specifies a Reference to the tone.”  ?


Section 1.1 says:

“The URI is most commonly the HTTP URL to the audio file.”

s/”the audio file”/”an audio file”

[LL] Agree.


Section 1.1. says:

“It is not possible to provide semantic indications or names for rendering characteristics
                that signals the intent and allows the recipient UA to decide how to render the received
information in an appropriate way.”

The sentence is very confusing. Why not simply say something like:

                “It is not possible to define semantics associated with a given tone.”

[LL] OK. I will replace the text with the text provided by Paul in


Section 4 defines the ABNF for the URN, but the is no text on how to “map” it into the Alert-Info header field ABNF:

For example, I assume that the URN is encoded using the opaque-part format of the absoluteURI, and that the sceme value is “urn”. I think it would be good to indicate that.

[LL]  My understanding is that we don't have consensus that  the current text must be changed. I would leave the text as it is.

Thank you



salud mailing list<>