Re: [salud] Revision of the examples

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Tue, 28 January 2014 21:22 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57ECC1A026C for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:22:07 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9kD_Sr8fOMFs for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls5.std.com [192.74.137.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70DA1A01A2 for <salud@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (svani@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0SLKAw7017227; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:20:13 -0500
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id s0SLHZEn3784801; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:17:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id s0SLHYhm3790937; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:17:34 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:17:34 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <201401282117.s0SLHYhm3790937@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
To: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
In-reply-to: <CACWXZj17wOqNecA=iwy6=Sn30f5h9y2t+_-jWjQ9ZJ9e7ZFM1Q@mail.gmail.com> (laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com)
References: <201311201944.rAKJiS7d5355422@shell01.TheWorld.com> <528D41F2.8090200@alum.mit.edu> <CACWXZj39wsahY-=VN1e7a=wLK_55H=oVYkeSbRrUce+jMzH_Vg@mail.gmail.com> <201401172041.s0HKf6DN3073812@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj21Q+xDLgGOQzGszWrMe3DxhCcqb_4YFUk5UPudA_NnFw@mail.gmail.com> <201401240129.s0O1TGoa3442517@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj17wOqNecA=iwy6=Sn30f5h9y2t+_-jWjQ9ZJ9e7ZFM1Q@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] Revision of the examples
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 21:22:07 -0000

> From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>

> *****
> So we choose the Signal 3 "internal".
> 
> Note that <urn:alert:priority:low> could not be given effect because it
> followed <urn:alert:source:internal>.    If the two URNs had appeared in
> the reverse order, the Signal 2 "external" would have been chosen, because
> <urn:alert:priority:low> would have been  given precedence.
> *******
> 
> OK for you?

That looks good to me.

Dale