Re: [salud] Revision of the examples

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 24 January 2014 01:29 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@shell01.TheWorld.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481A91A03CC for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:29:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WsDUvPKHTN6X for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:29:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls5.std.com [192.74.137.145]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6721A038A for <salud@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:29:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.theworld.com [192.74.137.71]) by TheWorld.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0O1TI6n010315; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:29:20 -0500
Received: from shell01.TheWorld.com (localhost.theworld.com [127.0.0.1]) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.12.8) with ESMTP id s0O1THtr3437964; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:29:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from worley@localhost) by shell01.TheWorld.com (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id s0O1TGoa3442517; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:29:16 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:29:16 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <201401240129.s0O1TGoa3442517@shell01.TheWorld.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
Sender: worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley)
To: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
In-reply-to: <CACWXZj21Q+xDLgGOQzGszWrMe3DxhCcqb_4YFUk5UPudA_NnFw@mail.gmail.com> (laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com)
References: <201311201944.rAKJiS7d5355422@shell01.TheWorld.com> <528D41F2.8090200@alum.mit.edu> <CACWXZj39wsahY-=VN1e7a=wLK_55H=oVYkeSbRrUce+jMzH_Vg@mail.gmail.com> <201401172041.s0HKf6DN3073812@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj21Q+xDLgGOQzGszWrMe3DxhCcqb_4YFUk5UPudA_NnFw@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] Revision of the examples
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 01:29:43 -0000

> >    So we choose the Signal 3.  Note that <urn:alert:priority:low> could
> >    not be given effect because it followed <urn:alert:source:internal>.
> >    If the two URNs had appeared in the reverse order, the Signal 2 would
> >    have been chosen, because <urn:alert:priority:low> would have been
> >    given precedence.

Looking at this again, it may be desirable to put a paragraph-break
after the first sentence.

Dale