Re: [salud] Revision of the examples

Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> Mon, 20 January 2014 09:18 UTC

Return-Path: <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B0D1A0044 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:18:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.323
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.323 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FVZwly3HRXAR for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:18:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x22f.google.com (mail-la0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 488F41A001D for <salud@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:18:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id el20so2780363lab.6 for <salud@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:18:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=0+1BxR1tQBveUjtmNhNKDVGH/A6tEJB8C74XcWzXW+c=; b=rhLkyyq7D9Wn/yygSlGfzw92a4HROewKkhY/LJbxoky4F8I8GEKFV5/FFu7gCdD6mD 1kgyF9ror4CClir0VJaMRR9bp4jL8jaqieyFiI1xTCxTvHdUDpYM39xEg+8lvjBrxPTI WwEbOWaW/9BeyxmZNqz3wcrPXRD0/5GgyQRBUbIvxkg94tdfZGzIDoafxaB/Amu0KjBj 6H4FO1KcZZXq8GpiS9BnuHylSiz0ej06Q9gPkMVsMnoR9/NzCkKjnTOvvK/FE3RdieE9 j3IAiOkSO8AehfWZzQh905PQ8NGX7ndbEwimjW/XASBWKJVYPPyV4smeJeohenqIdLUG uOBw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.148.104 with SMTP id tr8mr719642lbb.42.1390209533694; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:18:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.169.129 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 01:18:53 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <201401172041.s0HKf6DN3073812@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <201311201944.rAKJiS7d5355422@shell01.TheWorld.com> <528D41F2.8090200@alum.mit.edu> <CACWXZj39wsahY-=VN1e7a=wLK_55H=oVYkeSbRrUce+jMzH_Vg@mail.gmail.com> <201401172041.s0HKf6DN3073812@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 10:18:53 +0100
Message-ID: <CACWXZj21Q+xDLgGOQzGszWrMe3DxhCcqb_4YFUk5UPudA_NnFw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b3a83006b589504f063617a
Cc: "salud@ietf.org" <salud@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [salud] Revision of the examples
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 09:18:56 -0000

Dale,
This was your old text. I will incorporate it
again in the -11.

Thank you
Laura



2014/1/17 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>

> In Laura's message of 6 Jan, she gives a revision of the examples, but
> the -10 version uses a more detailed revision I provided a few days
> later.  However, Laura's version includes this further explanation at
> the end of example 4 (9.2.4):
>
>    So we choose the Signal 3.  Note that <urn:alert:priority:low> could
>    not be given effect because it followed <urn:alert:source:internal>.
>    If the two URNs had appeared in the reverse order, the Signal 2 would
>    have been chosen, because <urn:alert:priority:low> would have been
>    given precedence.
>
> This is a useful observation, and it didn't make it into -10.  All -10
> has is "So the Signal 3 "internal" is chosen.", which comes from my
> version.  I suggest replacing this sentence with Laura's paragraph.
>
> Dale
>