Re: [salud] Moving forward with the draft

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Fri, 18 October 2013 20:56 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F58F21F9BD3 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:56:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.282
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.282 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.155, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_NET=0.611, RDNS_NONE=0.1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KAWPYn7M+YP2 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:55:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:96]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613DD11E80E3 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.72]) by qmta09.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ekoU1m0051ZXKqc59kviBR; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 20:55:42 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta21.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id ekvh1m00S3ZTu2S3hkvh5P; Fri, 18 Oct 2013 20:55:42 +0000
Message-ID: <5261A04D.7060505@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 16:55:41 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: salud@ietf.org
References: <201310182044.r9IKi3VM3219677@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To: <201310182044.r9IKi3VM3219677@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1382129742; bh=9uUw7fdqAdcg2g02a66O0iTa+Ya6jnNEenotM9iS+ZA=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=c7LRXeFF8NNuYkOVEAO6Wx1WIqK0jtwiN/wql8XR7eJe+P0OIEykbv3GtYqBKj7NJ K6/MveNDZ1nA8UmXnFOuCFAzl8Z7Lmb81lQDUUAW/G1mX51PwvGoQxR0ReInMZRbzk Ay3W+7vgwWP5WWUrIJ0pITt/+gqfwNel4ANeJ1lNaF9lzEZgj9jlGhDyd8LNMOcwSz rWp/pavzK7qIrdHPxkoZDKiHYROzz2awe5qX+oV2zulzgThBIzYNNvqDqE4RFdPRp+ x2kPf/OCOTDVjifqSEwpsCzCmH8ms/TKaKKCFMqys/pyMUe9OX2dYs7yNc2cHrDdmf HNlaH+45Km2aw==
Subject: Re: [salud] Moving forward with the draft
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2013 20:56:08 -0000

WFM

On 10/18/13 4:44 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> [as chair]
>
> It is my belief that we have resolved all outstanding issues with the
> draft, excepting as detailed below.
>
> The revised URN namespace definition has received no comments from the
> URN-NID mailing list.  I have been unable to contact Alfred Hoenes, so
> presumably we will hear no objections from him.
>
> The other issues that I've known about I have filed in the issue
> tracker.  The list can be found at
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/salud/trac/report/1?asc=1&sort=ticket
>
> I believe that all of these issues have been fixed and discussed on
> the mailing list, with the possible exception of #6, 'Better
> explanation of "delay"'
> (http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/salud/trac/ticket/6).  But looking at
> section 3.1.6 and the changes to section 6.2.5
> (http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-07&url2=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-08)-08),
> I believe that that issue has been resolved as well.
>
> The only additional issue that I know of is that we haven't listed
> Alfred in the Acknowledgments section.
>
> If everyone agrees that there are no issues that I have not listed, I
> propose that we:
>
> - Produce a -09 version, listing Alfred in the Acknowledgments.
>
> - Proceed to WGLC
>
> - I search for a Document Shepherd to submit the draft to the IESG.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Dale
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud
>