IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [salud] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

worley@ariadne.com (Dale R. Worley) Fri, 16 May 2014 22:01 UTC

Return-Path: <worley@ariadne.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309F91A022A for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 May 2014 15:01:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BiONUwaxe_mx for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 May 2014 15:01:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:43:76:96:62:17]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D6A1A00E5 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 May 2014 15:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.27]) by qmta10.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2kuC1o0040bG4ec5Am1R1y; Fri, 16 May 2014 22:01:25 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com ([24.34.72.61]) by omta03.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2m1Q1o00F1KKtkw3Pm1R7F; Fri, 16 May 2014 22:01:25 +0000
Received: from hobgoblin.ariadne.com (hobgoblin.ariadne.com [127.0.0.1]) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s4GM1O9W010957 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 May 2014 18:01:24 -0400
Received: (from worley@localhost) by hobgoblin.ariadne.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s4GM1On8010955; Fri, 16 May 2014 18:01:24 -0400
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 18:01:24 -0400
Message-Id: <201405162201.s4GM1On8010955@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
From: worley@ariadne.com
Sender: worley@ariadne.com
To: salud@ietf.org
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1400277685; bh=W4GMqqlTxJLbXe+E8EZrxXUedIrFvI4ADv+KHt0qDlo=; h=Received:Received:Received:Received:Date:Message-Id:From:To: Subject; b=QQ/BqLvtUPE1K5f0jqitk7ASHq03A22hZLclwEPYdBLCkS5W6ZGrgukds6wlh7xBM fR9hPNL50W7LnaYp4/T3QmCGKjQBQ1549rAImeh29OqWFvRA6M9pFS+91Ahdsgy3Pr 1TrZYMNt0lNemnaVieLfH5sAZjF2kCcQ7KBjHS095DF+P7X/K/wN811M3J3QHFH4Ev ZrlzLli0ms/J1tTLuYVZrUUWzksZyqlbW7kNtbFCcDhSFNv+/8NpgJCKfh6LgZlKH9 IEngFZZvzmZKnZjCVo9/utz1wfNvZi8QtDxcei1Ku8XnnhhF1aX8eQScZpcFrr4cQr NfcJAL1PJ23UQ==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/salud/eTgmu8ykYqgnX15sSiABEGwgeL4
Subject: Re: [salud] Barry Leiba's Discuss on draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 22:01:34 -0000

[as an author]

> From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>

> The real question is: do we want to justify keeping standards action, or 
> do we want to relax to something that can be approved by an expert and 
> define the rules for the expert?

The advice that we'd need for an expert is very similar what we should
be giving for the creation of private names.  With no other
information, I think we should follow Barry's suggestion to not use
"standards action".  This leads to this plan:

(1) Review the rules for private names to ensure they express all the
restrictions we want to enforce.

(2) Duplicate these rules as advice for the expert.

(3) Reduce the rule to "expert review".

(4) Number 3 seems substantive to me, and we'd need to query the WG
about it.

What does everyone think?

Dale

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email