Re: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call

Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> Fri, 30 May 2014 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E9D1A6EF8 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 01:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.377
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.377 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4bGSMEbTjXtW for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 May 2014 01:04:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F2DE1A026D for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 01:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wi0-f176.google.com with SMTP id n15so606895wiw.15 for <salud@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 May 2014 01:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=TK7pyPmr8jqM4/Q/PZTWVoZbgPnFXPQ/Af7k2NQCe0w=; b=u7o1Q57pm9jsEjkxoZwYyCTKnyLutCXI+vvAl9VowPmU7wuAjpaqILs8g34uaSeTT5 XMZVtV32jbg5HBozvHGlhD2ku1LmFDyT/CgCbjhJV4h+HXXF/fDlMkEXPIFud4JzrVw4 Y83/Y8Zp/g2ROKH/z5324haVSGjbruGJhPrV5bzKAACl/l/+s/Qf0KCZFfgTopScOHAD BlbNE47VCxicSHhEXDkAj02zAtEEO0SddM0HiN1ndOoyt8rPTNUqu6oLRRTIE451Mjgb G/o63eBTj2EjkHoKrj8cs0/8w/gQV/ADmYo8Wv7DaqkadrDLoMt8yBwchBLRnhq0c1sZ YIPA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.205.239 with SMTP id lj15mr4162671wic.54.1401437047470; Fri, 30 May 2014 01:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.228.106 with HTTP; Fri, 30 May 2014 01:04:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201405291535.s4TFZdRJ017561@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
References: <201405291535.s4TFZdRJ017561@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 10:04:07 +0200
Message-ID: <CACWXZj1YKL+e2w6AAr-x7KYProkWypSpOCmOfAwQaVzKZ_Z9fQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c38d9663c07304fa997d47
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/salud/iOAiR-jHAw2O87T3K9_BRrZVxkA
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 May 2014 08:04:16 -0000

Dale,

I read the diff  and the changes are fine for me.

Thank you
Laura


2014-05-29 17:35 GMT+02:00 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>om>:

> [as an author]
>
> I've assembled a draft incorporating many of the changes that have
> been discussed.  This isn't an official "revision 12.1" because I am
> not the editor -- it's just to show the wording of the current
> proposals and what the whole text looks like with those changes.
>
> I've attempted to include everything which is tentatively agreed upon,
> that is, every proposed change for which there seems to be no
> outstanding disagreements.  What I haven't included is:
>
> - what <provider> values are
>
> - the policy for creating new standard URNs
>
> - the exact description of the IANA registry (because that depends on
>   the policy question)
>
> - the guidelines for creating new public or private URNs (because that
>   involves the policy question)
>
> The one proposal that I have omitted is one from the IESG to move the
> requirements to an appendix, because it appears that incorporating
> requirements into body sections is common practice.
>
> As far as I know, all objections and comments from the Secdir and
> Gen-art reviews and the IESG call are in one of the above three
> categories.
>
> The XML and text versions can be obtained from
>
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.txt
>
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.xml
>
> You can see the diffs between revision 12 and this draft with
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12&difftype=--html&submit=Go!&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.resiprocate.org%2Frep%2Fietf-drafts%2Fworley%2Fdraft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.txt
>
> Dale
>
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud
>