Re: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call

Dale,

I read the diff  and the changes are fine for me.

Thank you
Laura

2014-05-29 17:35 GMT+02:00 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com>:

> [as an author]
>
> I've assembled a draft incorporating many of the changes that have
> been discussed.  This isn't an official "revision 12.1" because I am
> not the editor -- it's just to show the wording of the current
> proposals and what the whole text looks like with those changes.
>
> I've attempted to include everything which is tentatively agreed upon,
> that is, every proposed change for which there seems to be no
> outstanding disagreements.  What I haven't included is:
>
> - what <provider> values are
>
> - the policy for creating new standard URNs
>
> - the exact description of the IANA registry (because that depends on
>   the policy question)
>
> - the guidelines for creating new public or private URNs (because that
>   involves the policy question)
>
> The one proposal that I have omitted is one from the IESG to move the
> requirements to an appendix, because it appears that incorporating
> requirements into body sections is common practice.
>
> As far as I know, all objections and comments from the Secdir and
> Gen-art reviews and the IESG call are in one of the above three
> categories.
>
> The XML and text versions can be obtained from
>
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.txt
>
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.xml
>
> You can see the diffs between revision 12 and this draft with
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12&difftype=--html&submit=Go!&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.resiprocate.org%2Frep%2Fietf-drafts%2Fworley%2Fdraft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.txt
>
> Dale
>
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud
>