Re: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Thu, 29 May 2014 19:17 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BFB41A01E1 for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 12:17:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J7clHTwnpU7c for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 29 May 2014 12:17:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:228]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC03E1A017E for <salud@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2014 12:17:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.12]) by qmta15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7u0u1o0020Fqzac5FvHtFf; Thu, 29 May 2014 19:17:53 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta08.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7vHt1o00d3ZTu2S3UvHtaf; Thu, 29 May 2014 19:17:53 +0000
Message-ID: <538787E1.8050405@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 15:17:53 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: salud@ietf.org
References: <201405291535.s4TFZdRJ017561@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
In-Reply-To: <201405291535.s4TFZdRJ017561@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1401391073; bh=yhmXCANey4bfUDkrnS/lTYgseubkPolpFEtgVGNT5OA=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=UOIRY7JgcH1Iz9bDQTFr9FNEk8bLClf3XxJfifdxGHdLgYlJU3hK49tT/i3/Um9jW 8f3KwNtW7WpsVHxOxRcZiTkvZk45DUGufcv3F6fcxhdGkj6FxbbRmXd6iYg5By3b+n zDJGw+7lhqA0y0tgVPzGTDYxWdsbhb1H3r0pvPNvBZpTvb7526R1ltdi/v4QvUzCGK lPEUDqo+MWtF1QN3iWsV3amUP7G3Xu2AVE9FilI/rKNz0g8CMxAi3cyzEzY69n8onx F8HONsze/nO7OsTfZWnxLz8rOhI+neL6xl1hPQcDQDzlfWoZnYRRPkQCmPAkYE3veL 0eBdf3L2IDE1A==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/salud/jEdj8wEp6u4cx6SH6oXD848CgPQ
Subject: Re: [salud] Draft revision from IESG call
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 19:17:59 -0000

Dale,

I reviewed the diff of the changes, and they look good to me.

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 5/29/14 11:35 AM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> [as an author]
>
> I've assembled a draft incorporating many of the changes that have
> been discussed.  This isn't an official "revision 12.1" because I am
> not the editor -- it's just to show the wording of the current
> proposals and what the whole text looks like with those changes.
>
> I've attempted to include everything which is tentatively agreed upon,
> that is, every proposed change for which there seems to be no
> outstanding disagreements.  What I haven't included is:
>
> - what <provider> values are
>
> - the policy for creating new standard URNs
>
> - the exact description of the IANA registry (because that depends on
>    the policy question)
>
> - the guidelines for creating new public or private URNs (because that
>    involves the policy question)
>
> The one proposal that I have omitted is one from the IESG to move the
> requirements to an appendix, because it appears that incorporating
> requirements into body sections is common practice.
>
> As far as I know, all objections and comments from the Secdir and
> Gen-art reviews and the IESG call are in one of the above three
> categories.
>
> The XML and text versions can be obtained from
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.txt
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.xml
>
> You can see the diffs between revision 12 and this draft with
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12&difftype=--html&submit=Go!&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.resiprocate.org%2Frep%2Fietf-drafts%2Fworley%2Fdraft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1.txt
>
> Dale
>
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud
>