Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax
Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com> Wed, 20 March 2013 14:55 UTC
Return-Path: <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A008021F8ADC for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DR2YwL9NuunF for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:55:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x22d.google.com (mail-la0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3C121F8AC2 for <salud@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:55:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-la0-f45.google.com with SMTP id er20so3146273lab.32 for <salud@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qnof2w42XqvpRIR9o3xJDtsPucG+jFjPZ4XuH6glOqQ=; b=RZjS32PuGPAOozllJ+a2TLXxiUtjbezOfji4v9uteb3DiIcfggGKaRGXtxq17eK8Fz JNvbNLhhF58I9WChhMQ27bIRniDKLt1fs0Q0cIlxojUg6ftCyZ/zVZZiFqHAEECq+zTp 7S/H66KlF5hr3zugShbaamHB4B6vCRi4udcQ08Ace+ISZLnD7+VHdxupSitSi996hgbg dCi3UJvBizXKhVd2wXffDaFC384kIKx9v2M7Ipocq16jna/pS7Mm2X1WgI6G0B+n9vjX 7twUjXSdbnDi4NjPX6vugtLxo0bwDbIHy4YIW9aFouFFiRLlm1pw1Q/BefFeVFAy+MyE ISzA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.147.36 with SMTP id th4mr5682450lab.19.1363791324773; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.95.99 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:55:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201303201422.r2KEMxhf809198@shell01.TheWorld.com>
References: <201303082040.r28Keh9U037525@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj2WVgPVdQ=DVvbC1CqkN6g88M2_E9YQK5wiLduxBaUeeg@mail.gmail.com> <201303132134.r2DLY5CI361272@shell01.TheWorld.com> <CACWXZj3qaC2RTJGum8ES4U6CKhFwQeHL17ipxO+onsq3M3VevQ@mail.gmail.com> <201303151919.r2FJJwr9508371@shell01.TheWorld.com> <5143B166.2010805@alum.mit.edu> <CACWXZj3M+FmmcyfNt+Rz=WutM5witacXe_vKuPSzkDROsSLioQ@mail.gmail.com> <201303201422.r2KEMxhf809198@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:55:24 +0100
Message-ID: <CACWXZj0m_un8mtXX0Gn10Ry8yqbwMLKNyQw6Cv9b9XqsipVNkw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Laura Liess <laura.liess.dt@googlemail.com>
To: "Dale R. Worley" <worley@ariadne.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f22c38176090a04d85c699b"
Cc: salud@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:55:26 -0000
Dale, >Should we have the contact be RAI in some form? I assume that >revisions will always be in the hands of some RAI working group. If this is possible, it is sure the better way to do it. Thank you Laura 2013/3/20 Dale R. Worley <worley@ariadne.com> > I'm revising the registration template based on your feedback. So > far, it's been straightforward to apply your suggestions. Looking > at it I see: > > Declared registrant of the namespace: > > Registering organization: IETF > > Designated contact: Laura Liess > > Designated contact email: l.liess@telekom.de > > Should we have the contact be RAI in some form? I assume that > revisions will always be in the hands of some RAI working group. > > Looking at existing registrations, there seems to be no convention for > who the declared registrant is. In some cases, it is a person at the > organization that is sponsoring the namespace. In other cases, it > appears to be an individual who is not strongly connected to the > organization that I think would be involved. For example, the > registrant of the "ietf" namespace is: > > Ryan Moats > jayhawk@att.com > AT&T > 15621 Drexel Circle > Omaha, NE 68135-2358 > > Dale >
- [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- [salud] Fwd: New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Dale R. Worley
- Re: [salud] New version of the ABNF-syntax Laura Liess