Archive

Hi Christer,

Could you have a loook at my answers to your comments Q6 to Q9?  If you
agree to them, I could publish the version -11 of the draft whch we could
send then to the IESG.

>

>
>
>
> Q6:
>
> -----
>
>
>
> Section 1.1 says:
>
>
>
> “In [RFC3261] this is done by including a URI in the Alert-Info header
> field, that specifies the tone.”
>
>
>
> Should the text say that the header field includes a REFERENCE to a tone?
> Later in the paragraph, you DO talk about the referenced tone.
>
>
>
[LL] Would you agree with the text   “In [RFC3261] this is done by
including a URI in the Alert-Info header field, that specifies a Reference
to the tone.”  ?

>
> Q7:
>
> ----
>
>
>
> Section 1.1 says:
>
>
>
> “The URI is most commonly the HTTP URL to the audio file.”
>
>
>
> s/”the audio file”/”an audio file”
>

[LL] Agree.

>
>
>
>
> Q8:
>
> -----
>
>
>
> Section 1.1. says:
>
>
>
> “It is not possible to provide semantic indications or names for rendering
> characteristics
>
>                 that signals the intent and allows the recipient UA to
> decide how to render the received
>
> information in an appropriate way.”
>
>
>
> The sentence is very confusing. Why not simply say something like:
>
>
>
>                 “It is not possible to define semantics associated with a
> given tone.”
>
>

[LL] OK. I will replace the text with the text provided by Paul in
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/current/msg00456.html.

>
>
>
> Q9:
>
> -----
>
>
>
> Section 4 defines the ABNF for the URN, but the is no text on how to “map”
> it into the Alert-Info header field ABNF:
>
>
>
> For example, I assume that the URN is encoded using the opaque-part format
> of the absoluteURI, and that the sceme value is “urn”. I think it would be
> good to indicate that.
>

[LL]  My understanding is that we don't have consensus that  the current
text must be changed. I would leave the text as it is.

Thank you
Laura

>
>

>
>
> Regards,
>
>
>
> Christer
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud
>
>

[salud] Fwd: Christer's review of draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-09