Re: [salud] Combined draft revision

Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu> Tue, 08 July 2014 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
X-Original-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: salud@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28FD91A015B for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 15:16:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.235
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.235 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PPw8jv2lk0Hk for <salud@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 15:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe14:44:76:96:59:212]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD051A0151 for <salud@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Jul 2014 15:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by qmta14.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Py7i1o0050QuhwU5EyGMSL; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 22:16:21 +0000
Received: from Paul-Kyzivats-MacBook-Pro.local ([50.138.229.164]) by omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id PyGM1o00C3ZTu2S3NyGMFX; Tue, 08 Jul 2014 22:16:21 +0000
Message-ID: <53BC6DB5.4070103@alum.mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 18:16:21 -0400
From: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@alum.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: salud@ietf.org
References: <201407082031.s68KV3vr020822@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
In-Reply-To: <201407082031.s68KV3vr020822@hobgoblin.ariadne.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1404857781; bh=E7NGATCMsQ3CAcEgm61RsPpZaLZNSbISObA1F9icFNk=; h=Received:Received:Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject: Content-Type; b=W9z9K1Do36sSikMu5Mg60q4IHSz2fWVOwLcGfYa9YdVcHBmmIknflc7+bItHzTo1P CfspeLj697lokOfdOlkhQcHy1CkoH2hSz3x23RXAiCl0+xGnRJ7G3Mm7r6P3jASx6u 9M+u1IXojkwdd3Ves6Y2znFVqoG2oO/xPXp5M0oYIYeFldxkaVhSRV4+mmfk2UcfKC 3ZJ4j1OmLpNM/K4xCAAF6thgFedR+uzTY6zRjxnKZCiBXgnwoAeLjtZ23+hwkrDoih XPpqejVxkKtVPCoYNFdMOpKZdzi69+aP8BBOZCEaCqIbJwPGK86jgLJhonXAZKyA8p jJLevu7YMytAQ==
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/salud/vY6jLElxYRD7OhVIWKRiYmXk9kk
Subject: Re: [salud] Combined draft revision
X-BeenThere: salud@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Sip ALerting for User Devices working group discussion list <salud.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/salud/>
List-Post: <mailto:salud@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud>, <mailto:salud-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 22:16:23 -0000

Hi Dale,

This is looking good.

A couple of little things:

Section 10.1 says:

    Extensions, either standard or private, MUST conform to the
    following principles:

This is certainly right for standard extensions. The expert reviewer 
enforces this. For private extensions, can we be normative? We want to 
be, but is that imposing constraints on people rather than code?

I noticed a misspelling in here. s/altert/alert/

	Thanks,
	Paul

On 7/8/14 4:31 PM, Dale R. Worley wrote:
> [as an author]
>
> I've updated the XML2RFC draft that incorporates both the "general
> revisions" (update1) and the changes for "specification required"
> (update3), along with one or two editorial changes.
>
> The XML and text versions can still be obtained from
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1and3.txt
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1and3.xml
>
> The change is that in the earlier version, some references weren't
> expressed with <xref target="..."/>.
>
> ***
>
> More importantly, I've made a set of changes to convert <provider>
> values into a first-come-first-served registry.  And, of course, a
> number of minor changes in wording.  These changes are based on the
> "-update1and3" draft described above.  The XML and text versions can
> be obtained from
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update4.txt
>
> https://svn.resiprocate.org/rep/ietf-drafts/worley/draft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update4.xml
>
> You can see the diffs between the -update1and3 draft and this draft
> with
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.resiprocate.org%2Frep%2Fietf-drafts%2Fworley%2Fdraft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update1and3.txt&difftype=--html&submit=Go!&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.resiprocate.org%2Frep%2Fietf-drafts%2Fworley%2Fdraft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update4.txt
>
> You can see the diffs between revision 12 and this draft with
>
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-salud-alert-info-urns-12&difftype=--html&submit=Go!&url2=http%3A%2F%2Fsvn.resiprocate.org%2Frep%2Fietf-drafts%2Fworley%2Fdraft-worley-salud-alert-info-urns-12-update4.txt
>
> This draft covers all the changes that we have discussed as being desirable.
>
> ***
>
> Comments?
>
> Dale
>
> _______________________________________________
> salud mailing list
> salud@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/salud
>