Re: [SAM] sam-baseline-protocol-00

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 18 July 2012 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8DF21F8789 for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:44:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.422
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.422 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.177, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QiaYD9YIFouV for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AD3521F8779 for <sam@irtf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:44:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,610,1336374000"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="666833583"
Received: from smtp2.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.159.114]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2012 07:44:52 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.34]) by smtp2.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q6IEiqAp013699; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:44:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.13]) by vmwexceht04-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.34]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 07:44:51 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: "<buford@samrg.org> <buford@samrg.org>" <buford@samrg.org>
Thread-Topic: sam-baseline-protocol-00
Thread-Index: AQHNZLmv0+Wd/7ENG0+4C9O5C5zCxJcvP3gAgAA9uACAABZ5AA==
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:44:51 +0000
Message-ID: <8530BDC7-1739-44EA-8E7C-AD8AB747F284@netapp.com>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1207162224420.9044@mw-PC> <BC314931-8A87-460A-BCA8-A136641A4608@netapp.com> <055b01cd64b9$ad1fc440$075f4cc0$@org> <43463C60-CAED-498A-AD80-9FC349833827@netapp.com> <d87e07af5bd73956d1edcbe8c8883b1b.squirrel@www.samrg.org>
In-Reply-To: <d87e07af5bd73956d1edcbe8c8883b1b.squirrel@www.samrg.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.115]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_48724875-EA94-4DA6-B20D-D837F810454B"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<sam@irtf.org>" <sam@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [SAM] sam-baseline-protocol-00
X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" <sam.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/sam>
List-Post: <mailto:sam@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 14:44:45 -0000

Hi,

On Jul 18, 2012, at 15:24, <buford@samrg.org>
 <buford@samrg.org> wrote:
> Here is the table in the March draft, section 15:
...
> That is, we are using RELOAD exp_a_req and exp_a_ans for all cases.

OK, good. (Since the draft isn't available, it was kinda hard for me to see this table :-)

> So the RELOAD message code will be either 35 or 36.
> Inside the RELOAD message body will be one of the ALM message codes.
> 
> I will resubmit the draft and let you know the specific message.

Great, thanks. We do need to wrap this up.

Lars