Re: [SAM] sam-baseline-protocol-00

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 18 July 2012 09:42 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63C5321F86DD for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:42:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.414
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.414 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.185, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qChpAGa+y52w for <sam@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:42:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.netapp.com (mx2.netapp.com [216.240.18.37]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD61221F86B6 for <sam@irtf.org>; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.77,609,1336374000"; d="p7s'?scan'208"; a="666777299"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx2-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 18 Jul 2012 02:43:30 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com (vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.35]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id q6I9hTcd004029; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:43:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.13]) by vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.35]) with mapi id 14.02.0298.004; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 02:43:29 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: John Buford <buford@samrg.org>
Thread-Topic: sam-baseline-protocol-00
Thread-Index: AQHNZLmv0+Wd/7ENG0+4C9O5C5zCxJcvP3gA
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:43:28 +0000
Message-ID: <43463C60-CAED-498A-AD80-9FC349833827@netapp.com>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1207162224420.9044@mw-PC> <BC314931-8A87-460A-BCA8-A136641A4608@netapp.com> <055b01cd64b9$ad1fc440$075f4cc0$@org>
In-Reply-To: <055b01cd64b9$ad1fc440$075f4cc0$@org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.115]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2D07D792-A537-4CFB-BE3E-8B4F95E36A90"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "<sam@irtf.org>" <sam@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [SAM] sam-baseline-protocol-00
X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" <sam.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/sam>
List-Post: <mailto:sam@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 09:42:57 -0000

Hi,

On Jul 18, 2012, at 9:48, John Buford wrote:
> We're using the experimental message codes exp_{a,b}_{req,res} defined in
> 14.8 of p2psip-base-22
> in the baseline draft presented at Paris (http://www.samrg.org/paris-83/)

Section 14 of the baseline protocol lists 13 message codes, whereas Section 14.8 defines the four experimental message codes you list above. How are you mapping the 13 to the 4? Also, the values in the baseline protocol are different from the ones in p2psip-base-22.

> However I think when I submitted this draft there was a message from the
> submittal tool
> that RG items had to be approved by chairs, I don't think I know how do to
> do that.

Try again and send me the error message, please.

Lars