Re: [SAM] [irsg] IRSG review for draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-02

"Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com> Wed, 01 May 2013 17:31 UTC

Return-Path: <lars@netapp.com>
X-Original-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sam@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D6E21F8FEC; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:31:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.818
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.818 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LfVO3CCcu3G4; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:31:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx12.netapp.com (mx12.netapp.com [216.240.18.77]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0D5A21F9ABC; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:31:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,590,1363158000"; d="scan'208";a="46971292"
Received: from smtp1.corp.netapp.com ([10.57.156.124]) by mx12-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 01 May 2013 10:31:31 -0700
Received: from vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com (exchsmtp.hq.netapp.com [10.106.77.35]) by smtp1.corp.netapp.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/NTAP-1.6) with ESMTP id r41HVUP3017198; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:31:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from VMWEXCEHT06-PRD.hq.netapp.com (10.106.77.104) by vmwexceht05-prd.hq.netapp.com (10.106.77.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.342.3; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:31:30 -0700
Received: from SACEXCMBX01-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.2.71]) by vmwexceht06-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.77.104]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Wed, 1 May 2013 10:31:29 -0700
From: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>
To: John Buford <buford@samrg.org>
Thread-Topic: [irsg] [SAM] IRSG review for draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-02
Thread-Index: AQHORoRcUqavUo9ck0qVRRTlwGBeA5jxC7wA
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 17:31:29 +0000
Message-ID: <F47E2CD1-FC87-4E97-99B4-6364B1CB7DC7@netapp.com>
References: <0A9F560A-846B-40DC-83BB-DE85D7486606@ifi.uio.no> <4B1FBAB9-36C6-42B5-B976-6A156C72E432@ifi.uio.no> <517CD713.3060006@informatik.haw-hamburg.de> <0297C4A1-18B3-4485-AEF2-9D29667C3E5B@ifi.uio.no> <48E0C724888CBE47A7912FCEB14DF8F406F0E2@AZ-US1EXMB02.global.avaya.com> <1599A8CE-8979-426D-A208-44D8C6288687@ifi.uio.no> <1896D978-7B37-4902-8C63-0B60716C3F2E@netapp.com> <473DFE40-C402-4A75-87CF-2157F005CCDD@samrg.org>
In-Reply-To: <473DFE40-C402-4A75-87CF-2157F005CCDD@samrg.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.104.60.117]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <06E7DC71D5D59F4B85F7AF84503D3E60@tahoe.netapp.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "sam@irtf.org" <sam@irtf.org>, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>, Internet Research Steering Group <irsg@irtf.org>
Subject: Re: [SAM] [irsg] IRSG review for draft-irtf-samrg-sam-baseline-protocol-02
X-BeenThere: sam@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "For use by members of the Scalable Adaptive Multicast \(SAM\) RG" <sam.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/sam>
List-Post: <mailto:sam@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sam>, <mailto:sam-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 17:31:40 -0000

On May 1, 2013, at 17:58, John Buford <buford@samrg.org> wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer.   It does seem then that experimental would be more accurate.
> Can we change that after the formal poll ends or should we change it now?

After is fine. The IRSG is CC'ed, so they can take the change to Experimental into account when reviewing. 

Thanks,
Lars