IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [sami] Trying to figure out where we are

Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com> Wed, 24 August 2011 12:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hadi@mojatatu.com>
X-Original-To: sami@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sami@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BFC421F8751 for <sami@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:29:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.624
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.624 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.353, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wSP4xqpi4I2J for <sami@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-fx0-f44.google.com (mail-fx0-f44.google.com [209.85.161.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBE621F8B4A for <sami@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:29:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by fxe6 with SMTP id 6so1048924fxe.31 for <sami@ietf.org>; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:30:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.223.100.145 with SMTP id y17mr2102847fan.32.1314189024721; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:30:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.108.1 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2011 05:30:04 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201108241223.p7OCN51m005937@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
References: <CA77E180.13DD5%bschlies@cisco.com> <4E541EE7.1080605@gmail.com> <000c01cc6220$3b18fa70$b14aef50$@com> <201108241403546051654@chinamobile.com> <201108241223.p7OCN51m005937@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com>
From: Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@mojatatu.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 08:30:04 -0400
Message-ID: <CAAFAkD9T7cb7fmsYPYL2onD-GgJyBN1j1puL7CqZPGw1EEiGYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "Yingjie Gu(yingjie)" <guyingjie@huawei.com>, Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>, "sami@ietf.org" <sami@ietf.org>, zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
Subject: Re: [sami] Trying to figure out where we are
X-BeenThere: sami@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: State Migration <sami.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/sami>, <mailto:sami-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/sami>
List-Post: <mailto:sami@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sami-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sami>, <mailto:sami-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:29:16 -0000

On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> How is this any different than standard VM migration as practiced
> today? What special requirements result from the above scenario?
>
> The topic of this effort is "state migration". In order to make
> progress, we need to be very specific about what kind of state and in
> what devices needs to be transferred. And why existing approaches as
> practiced today are insufficient.
>
> If folk cannot (in one or two paragraphs) answer the above questions,
> I do not think writing an Internet Draft about the above would be a
> good use of anyone's time.

+1.

cheers,
jamal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email