Re: [savi] Call for WG items for a potential rechartering

"Jun Bi" <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn> Fri, 17 June 2011 03:08 UTC

Return-Path: <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C5921F8519 for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.103
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.103 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN=1.495, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E7Y64CZHZP2K for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.tsinghua.edu.cn (smtp.tsinghua.edu.cn [166.111.8.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB2DB21F8511 for <savi@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 20:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from th053212.ip.tsinghua.edu.cn ([59.66.53.212] helo=junbiVAIOz138) by smtp.tsinghua.edu.cn with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>) id 1QXPQ4-0000tA-W0; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:08:29 +0800
Message-ID: <CF9095BD8A5A4348B1B011A7E364C2D5@junbiVAIOz138>
From: Jun Bi <junbi@tsinghua.edu.cn>
To: Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>, SAVI Mailing List <savi@ietf.org>
References: <BANLkTimtNw0DWHMqY6sh1QEkBLLYSag9xg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinqXZF5_g3KxR17cL_hrmkn0bL83w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinqXZF5_g3KxR17cL_hrmkn0bL83w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 11:08:24 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3508.1109
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3508.1109
Cc: int-ads@tools.ietf.org, Christian Vogt <christian.vogt@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [savi] Call for WG items for a potential rechartering
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:08:38 -0000

Dear WG chairs,

Here are some suggestions.

I think after the solutions are finialized, then the SAVI mib is necessary,
here is an example http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-an-savi-mib/

Aslo, after the solution senario for fixed LAN is finalized, then the 
senario of WLAN
needs to be consdiered, espeially for the host moving in centrailized WLAN 
(CAPWEB case) and distribued WLAN.
Here is an example http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bi-savi-wlan/

Based on CERENT's collabration with telecom carrieres such as China telecom,
the telecom has some requirements to deploy savi at BRAS equipment, to bind 
IPv6 source address with PPP session,
then at that case, maybe SAVI WG needs to study the senarios and 
requirements, then proivide guidelines or solution enhancement.

Moveover, to extend SAVI to intra-AS and inter-AS senario may aslo needs to 
be studied, starting at how the current solution
resolves the problems, is there any new idea can enhance it.

Thank you very much!

Jun Bi

-----原始邮件----- 
From: Jean-Michel Combes
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2011 4:49 AM
To: SAVI Mailing List
Cc: int-ads@tools.ietf.org ; Christian Vogt
Subject: Re: [savi] Call for WG items for a potential rechartering

Folks,

just a friendly reminder about the deadline.

Best regards.

JMC.

2011/6/6 Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>:
> Folks,
>
> As promised during the last SAVI meeting in Prague, to prepare the
> next IETF meeting, I would like to know whether WG members believe
> there are still open issues the WG needs to work on or not.
>
> If so, please, reply to this email, providing a clear description of
> the item and your contribution (i.e. Editor, Co-Author, Reviewer). For
> each proposed item, at least three volunteers ready to review the
> future document are requested.
>
> If you believe the WG has finished the work and can be closed, don't
> hesitate to tell it too.
>
> The deadline to reply is 2011-06-20.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards.
>
> JMC.
>
_______________________________________________
savi mailing list
savi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi