Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3926)
"Leaf Yeh" <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com> Sat, 05 April 2014 02:37 UTC
Return-Path: <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8CA1A019F for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 19:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Wp3NKiUTF2x2 for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 19:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com (mail-pb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB1A1A0056 for <savi@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 2014 19:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id uo5so4259380pbc.32 for <savi@ietf.org>; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 19:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:thread-index:content-language; bh=uq7E5QuKIuZYHAXPtj9tI4FeGRlX1xnZvtS90n0wTVU=; b=IRgut5SPgYbDKJXvr7CUPLCYU9NxKUZeznexbS7Pb8xfccaxBssxein+6DGolpTLVU /khKIOys7hecyOPuLQv3HigziMmFu+8zo8wonK9CgCkmgswQ0ihrlikCqfviQcD7KYEY Vjq7aqfezjGHP3eSu/E616zKg/9arb+CFf/nxziS83JJaSqjcXmvjgI60gY4S6OVnLZJ tc5yoNUGrLsTXsEm4hzerQ90asQ7SoR/inamnyUtegPZwzkeDoI8kxqmuVjH+vO+Oots LdoOWK2x+8wcw8UFGHtm1iBwEbZjtArjmpLu9hhn1NSwcFbB/KN4SEjbyA4Cq/Q5bPh5 PzDQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.145.166 with SMTP id sv6mr18674068pab.31.1396665420098; Fri, 04 Apr 2014 19:37:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from PC ([111.193.212.109]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id id10sm20878620pbc.35.2014.04.04.19.36.13 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Apr 2014 19:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
From: Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>
To: nordmark@acm.org, marcelo@it.uc3m.es, elevyabe@cisco.com
References: <20140321105153.C31F37FC399@rfc-editor.org> <4191B0B1-BCEE-4F0B-BC06-A17F26A09533@nominum.com> <532d7728.4387440a.099e.4779@mx.google.com> <4B7FAFCA-B811-472A-A812-C08E97FF713D@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B7FAFCA-B811-472A-A812-C08E97FF713D@nominum.com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:35:43 +0800
Message-ID: <533f6c4b.6ac3440a.1a50.430e@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B7_01CF50BA.E8DC6210"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: Ac9Hcn8GZbjmEjb0R9aYj0NBaxMuiQJAVX8A
Content-Language: zh-cn
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/AfFTA7rwiX4Uu7bFBq7sdR52D8E
Cc: savi@ietf.org, 'Ted Lemon' <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3926)
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi/>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 02:37:09 -0000
Dear Eric and authors: Pls. verify this Errata ticket (3926 @ http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6620 ). BTW, could you tell me the meaning of the sign of '.../-' in the Fig.2 of RFC6620 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6620#section-3.2.3 )? For example, VP_NA/-, TimeOut/-, etc. Best Regards, Leaf -----Original Message----- From: Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.lemon@nominum.com] Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 11:05 PM To: Leaf Yeh Cc: savi@ietf.org; nordmark@acm.org; marcelo@it.uc3m.es; elevyabe@cisco.com; Brian Haberman; jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3926) On Mar 22, 2014, at 6:42 AM, Leaf Yeh < <mailto:leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com> leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com> wrote: > Could we ask the input from the authors of RFC 6620 or the input from > SAVI-WG on this reported Errata? Could the authors please work with Leaf to figure out if this erratum is correct? I do not have time to wade deeply enough into the document to either accept or reject it on my own at the moment. Thanks!
- [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3926) RFC Errata System
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… Ted Lemon
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… Leaf Yeh
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… Ted Lemon
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… Leaf Yeh
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… marcelo bagnulo braun
- [savi] [Errata Verified] RFC6620 (3926) RFC Errata System