Re: [savi] Status of draft-ietf-savi-fcfs

[Stephen Farrell <[e-mail]>]

FWIW, I agree with Joel, the WG needs to figure this one out
I think, otherwise we may hit the same or a similar discuss
on multiple documents. As I said in an offlist mail to Joel,
I'm happy to try help with that to the extent that that's
useful, so folks should feel free to ping me if they want.

Cheers,
S.

On 30/05/11 15:18, Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> This change represents a major change in the assumptions of the working
> group.  Stephen is correct that the charter takes the view he espouses
> on this.  But I would like to see discussion on the WG mailing list,
> with agreement by the WG to a change of this scope, rather than merely
> having the ADs decide how to solve the issue.  (I suspect that given the
> charter, the resolution will be the one requested.  But this is simply
> too central to the work for the IESG to direct the change.)
> 
> Yours,
> Joel
> 
> On 5/30/2011 3:15 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
>> This draft was in IESG review last week....
> 
>> * You should make the changes suggested by Stephen to avoid privacy
>> impacts of unnecessary logging information from this technology
> ...