Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3926)
marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es> Sat, 05 April 2014 08:13 UTC
Return-Path: <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078DB1A0369 for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 01:13:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xjHdSVT_hqEC for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 01:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (smtp02.uc3m.es [163.117.176.132]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703C21A0367 for <savi@ietf.org>; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 01:12:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id A427D894AC1; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 10:12:53 +0200 (CEST)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from [10.0.1.2] (15.111.220.87.dynamic.jazztel.es [87.220.111.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: marcelo@smtp02.uc3m.es) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D3A388738C; Sat, 5 Apr 2014 10:12:53 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <533FBB04.1010404@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 10:12:52 +0200
From: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>, nordmark@acm.org, elevyabe@cisco.com
References: <20140321105153.C31F37FC399@rfc-editor.org> <4191B0B1-BCEE-4F0B-BC06-A17F26A09533@nominum.com> <532d7728.4387440a.099e.4779@mx.google.com> <4B7FAFCA-B811-472A-A812-C08E97FF713D@nominum.com> <533f6c4b.6ac3440a.1a50.430e@mx.google.com>
In-Reply-To: <533f6c4b.6ac3440a.1a50.430e@mx.google.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1224-7.5.0.1017-20610.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--21.979-7.0-31-1
X-imss-scan-details: No--21.979-7.0-31-1
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/I1tfYtUxVS2FNOE9hovggtjw_QI
Cc: savi@ietf.org, 'Ted Lemon' <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Subject: Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3926)
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi/>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2014 08:13:04 -0000
Hi, thanks for spotting this. I agree with the Errata and it should be approved. Regards, marcelo El 05/04/14 04:35, Leaf Yeh escribió: > > Dear Eric and authors: > > Pls. verify this Errata ticket (3926 @ > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6620 ). > > BTW, could you tell me the meaning of the sign of '.../-' in the Fig.2 > of RFC6620 (http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6620#section-3.2.3 )? > > For example, VP_NA/-, TimeOut/-, etc. > > Best Regards, > > Leaf > > -----Original Message----- > From: Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.lemon@nominum.com] > Sent: Monday, March 24, 2014 11:05 PM > To: Leaf Yeh > Cc: savi@ietf.org; nordmark@acm.org; marcelo@it.uc3m.es; > elevyabe@cisco.com; Brian Haberman; jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com > Subject: Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3926) > > On Mar 22, 2014, at 6:42 AM, Leaf Yeh <leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com > <mailto:leaf.yeh.sdo@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > Could we ask the input from the authors of RFC 6620 or the input from > > > SAVI-WG on this reported Errata? > > Could the authors please work with Leaf to figure out if this erratum > is correct? I do not have time to wade deeply enough into the > document to either accept or reject it on my own at the moment. > > Thanks! >
- [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3926) RFC Errata System
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… Ted Lemon
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… Leaf Yeh
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… Ted Lemon
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… Leaf Yeh
- Re: [savi] [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6620 (3… marcelo bagnulo braun
- [savi] [Errata Verified] RFC6620 (3926) RFC Errata System