Re: [savi] Which vendors have coded and which operators have deployed?

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Sun, 08 May 2016 04:44 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9BA112B063 for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2016 21:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.297
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.297 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IfsZ7VVh5oYv for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 May 2016 21:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (swm.pp.se [212.247.200.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BED812D096 for <savi@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 May 2016 21:44:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id F1480A4; Sun, 8 May 2016 06:44:01 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1462682641; bh=ip7QM+I0amrh7Y5uDdI+4mg7ZI0yQ5cq/yvQMvDVT64=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=J1SDbmrkcS6vys8zxqm+thXDJtRyBsZjlfJqXN2NEr+HTNj6ofCo3x81TfIE9TNnj JHaiD/zabZDNIBvOS4gFW+hTU8QgdBW1pnKHOSsNavPTavFBTup2NpBNQ5zpQQOVY0 eUylOSoLGGTA3fGlUIxSwZGkUYSbBIEBq5BfPdg0=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E85A3; Sun, 8 May 2016 06:44:01 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 06:44:01 +0200
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: Bingyang Liu <bjornliu@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPLDopLtmoG2MvDStE+o0E-WYiN+V0qmQQ-7qST8T5VbLnTETQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605080643210.7599@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <29929BBA-5744-42FC-8C3E-AC381A91A986@senki.org> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605071117210.7599@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAPLDopKaqzWzuD4+kikkdzuJkJp+ME-BQU4Ny3KduH0WLh+RBw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1605080404520.7599@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAPLDopLtmoG2MvDStE+o0E-WYiN+V0qmQQ-7qST8T5VbLnTETQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savi/Xoj0hDvilVWAropN1ekCMX0bJ1s>
Cc: SAVI Mailing List <savi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [savi] Which vendors have coded and which operators have deployed?
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/savi/>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 04:44:07 -0000

On Sun, 8 May 2016, Bingyang Liu wrote:

> Hi
>
> What are these tests about? I couldn't find anything related with SAVI on
> the webpage, maybe because I cannot read Swedish.

These are devices that were tested against 
https://secureenduserconnection.se/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/SEC-Secure-End-user-Connection-2015-08-26.pdf 
or earlier revisions of it.

If you click on the vendor names in the earlier link, in some of them 
you'll find documents (in english) which lists what was tested and how to 
configure it.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se