IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [savi] AD review of draft-ietf-savi-fcfs

Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> Thu, 05 May 2011 22:30 UTC

Return-Path: <nordmark@acm.org>
X-Original-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81BA6E08B8 for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2011 15:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rektLnLm5aV1 for <savi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 May 2011 15:30:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2708E0813 for <savi@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 May 2011 15:30:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.1.6] (128-107-239-233.cisco.com [128.107.239.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.8.Beta0-Sonic/8.13.7) with ESMTP id p45MTvkK009235 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 5 May 2011 15:29:58 -0700
Message-ID: <4DC324E4.3010206@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 15:29:56 -0700
From: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110414 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
References: <4DC19DD5.4040209@piuha.net> <4DC1D953.4020207@acm.org> <4DC25387.3080208@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <4DC25387.3080208@piuha.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: draft-ietf-savi-fcfs@tools.ietf.org, SAVI Mailing List <savi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [savi] AD review of draft-ietf-savi-fcfs
X-BeenThere: savi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list for the SAVI working group at IETF <savi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/savi>
List-Post: <mailto:savi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savi>, <mailto:savi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2011 22:30:15 -0000

On 5/5/11 12:36 AM, Jari Arkko wrote:
> Erik,
>
>> Proxy send assumes that the host is aware of the proxy, since the way
>> the packets are authenticated are different.
>>
>> Thus while proxy send is useful for e.g., MIP HAs, it doesn't help for
>> something which needs to work with basic SeND.
>
> Ok. Can this be stated in the draft?

Sure.

But shouldn't it belong in an Applicability section in the proxy SeND 
spec (as well)?

    Erik

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email