Re: [savnet] Some words about the BoF

Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn> Thu, 24 March 2022 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
X-Original-To: savnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: savnet@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DD13A11A9 for <savnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:26:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jYnrqBNMuPcd for <savnet@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-m17638.qiye.163.com (mail-m17638.qiye.163.com [59.111.176.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4F6F3A1196 for <savnet@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 05:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [106.121.136.251]) by mail-m17638.qiye.163.com (Hmail) with ESMTPA id 549541C0182; Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:26:22 +0800 (CST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-E0D6E63A-BE74-4242-AF70-380781959247
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 20:26:20 +0800
Message-Id: <0B85D702-D36B-4FDB-86CE-136E7B71CADC@tsinghua.org.cn>
References: <F86F2091-92B8-4185-B52C-CE1B3868212A@cisco.com>
Cc: savnet@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <F86F2091-92B8-4185-B52C-CE1B3868212A@cisco.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (19D52)
X-HM-Spam-Status: e1kfGhgUHx5ZQUtXWQgPGg8OCBgUHx5ZQUlOS1dZCBgUCR5ZQVlLVUtZV1 kWDxoPAgseWUFZKDYvK1lXWShZQUpMS0tKN1dZLVlBSVdZDwkaFQgSH1lBWRkYQ0xWTB4fSh1NTk kdGExPVRMBExYaEhckFA4PWVdZFhoPEhUdFFlBWU9LSFVKSktITUpVS1kG
X-HM-Sender-Digest: e1kMHhlZQR0aFwgeV1kSHx4VD1lBWUc6OC46GRw6KD5CLxEQMjo1Ajgw MTZPCzRVSlVKTU9DSklPTENJTElJVTMWGhIXVQwaFRwaEhEOFTsPCBIVHBMOGlUUCRxVGBVFWVdZ EgtZQVlKS01VSklKVUpITVVJTkpZV1kIAVlBQ0hLSzcG
X-HM-Tid: 0a7fbbe4670bd993kuws549541c0182
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/savnet/cmQ8YSTUzcSU4fbfIoX9ycS6HZU>
Subject: Re: [savnet] Some words about the BoF
X-BeenThere: savnet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <savnet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/savnet>, <mailto:savnet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/savnet/>
List-Post: <mailto:savnet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:savnet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savnet>, <mailto:savnet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 12:26:33 -0000

Hi, Eric:
For the problem space, I think SAVNET wants just to find the general solution for validating the source, which can be deployed incrementally and in wider scenarios than the current existing mechanisms.
If we can finalize such solutions, the network operators will be free of DDoS attack for the services that runs on their networks.
There are challenges to accomplish this aim, but it deserves us to achieve it.

Aijun Wang
China Telecom

> On Mar 24, 2022, at 20:09, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <evyncke=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> As the responsible AD for this BoF, I would like to thank the chairs and presenters for a well-run BoF and clear and articulated presentations. I also appreciated the many questions, i.e., there is interest in this domain.
>  
> Just to clarify what I said in the mike, as an individual contributor [1]:
> Well-defined problem space
> Are there only 2 solutions in this problem space ?
>  
> So, my *personal* conclusion is that it is too early to create a WG but this decision is not mine but IESG one.
>  
> Regards
>  
> -éric
>  
> [1] as we were running out of time, I forgot to mention that those comments were without my AD hat. Sorry for the confusion.
> -- 
> savnet mailing list
> savnet@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/savnet