[scale] Third (and final?) call to discuss scaling VPNs
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 07 January 2014 10:46 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: scale@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scale@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3321AD9AE for <scale@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 02:46:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mDP_xxXOJDDI for <scale@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 02:46:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6081ACC81 for <scale@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 02:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s07Ak3pd005383 for <scale@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:46:03 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (16.17.90.92.rev.sfr.net [92.90.17.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s07Ak0lT005342 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for <scale@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2014 10:46:02 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: scale@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:46:03 -0000
Message-ID: <00d101cf0b95$aa505de0$fef119a0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac8LlXo7rmQfRaqqT/KfoIgUYVLR3Q==
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: [scale] Third (and final?) call to discuss scaling VPNs
X-BeenThere: scale@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: MPLS VPN Scaling <scale.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scale>, <mailto:scale-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scale/>
List-Post: <mailto:scale@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scale-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scale>, <mailto:scale-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 10:46:15 -0000
My previous two emails may have been lost in the vacations. It is now a working week for most people, so let's have one more attempt to see whether there is interest in this topic. Thanks, Adrian > -----Original Message----- > From: scale [mailto:scale-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > Sent: 03 January 2014 22:21 > To: scale@ietf.org > Subject: [scale] Scaling VPNs in the New Year > > Sending this again in the hope of catching some people at their desks at the > start of January. > > Adrian > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: scale [mailto:scale-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel > > Sent: 25 December 2013 21:42 > > To: scale@ietf.org > > Subject: [scale] Scaling VPNs at Christmas > > > > Hello Scale Mailing List, > > > > I'm a bit puzzled by the lack of activity on this list. If there is genuine > > support for the idea of a BoF to discuss scaling VPNs (issues, requirements, > > moving towards solutions) I would have expected to see more traffic. > Certainly, > > if there is no more evidence of enthusiasm to discuss this then I don't think > we > > will go ahead with a face-to-face meeting (i.e. a BoF) at the London IETF. > > > > I had expected to hear a chorus of complaints from operators about how they > > struggle with their deployments today, and how they want to grow them soon. > I > > thought I was going to hear from a number of operators about the VPN > > requirements of data centers. And I had expected a number of vendors to be > > wanting to talk about how they address these problems. My expectation had > > been > > that we would talk about different scaling challenges across the VPN space and > > learn what techniques could be common. > > > > But it is OK! > > If no-one has scaling concerns or if no-one wants to talk about them right > now, > > we can move on. > > > > Cheers, > > Adrian > > > _______________________________________________ > scale mailing list > scale@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scale
- [scale] Third (and final?) call to discuss scalin… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [scale] Third (and final?) call to discuss sc… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [scale] Third (and final?) call to discuss sc… Shah, Himanshu
- Re: [scale] Third (and final?) call to discuss sc… ramki Krishnan
- Re: [scale] Third (and final?) call to discuss sc… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [scale] Third (and final?) call to discuss sc… Rob Shakir
- Re: [scale] Third (and final?) call to discuss sc… Rob Shakir