Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentially moving to IETF
"Chernin, Michael A." <mchernin@dtcc.com> Wed, 15 February 2012 14:53 UTC
Return-Path: <mchernin@dtcc.com>
X-Original-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E85321F8674 for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:53:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pAVq7JDeUSW for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:53:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sxinet05.dtcc.com (sxinet05.dtcc.com [207.45.45.43]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362C421F8545 for <scap_interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:53:11 -0800 (PST)
From: "Chernin, Michael A." <mchernin@dtcc.com>
Thread-Topic: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentially moving to IETF
Thread-Index: AczrY9ZA/rI0ysEqR+uJzeU+eJNThgAM6xSAABYlfpA=
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:53:02 +0000
Message-ID: <E3EFB6C0D90F82478AF227AA85ECF38015ADCCE2@SXEMBP01.corp.dtcc.com>
References: <E3EFB6C0D90F82478AF227AA85ECF38015ADCAC0@SXEMBP01.corp.dtcc.com> <CB6042FB.2C620%kent_landfield@mcafee.com>
In-Reply-To: <CB6042FB.2C620%kent_landfield@mcafee.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.18.113.13]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E3EFB6C0D90F82478AF227AA85ECF38015ADCCE2SXEMBP01corpdtc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "kent_landfield@mcafee.com" <kent_landfield@mcafee.com>, "scap_interest@ietf.org" <scap_interest@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentially moving to IETF
X-BeenThere: scap_interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion List for IETFers interested in the Security Content Automation Protocol \(SCAP\)." <scap_interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scap_interest>
List-Post: <mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 14:53:12 -0000
Kent, understood. Like the vendors, I do agree that certain standards need to go to IETF. But, today the only people that would be voting during IETF calls would be the federal government and security tool vendors. I am going to be hesitant in supporting a move of all standards until there are standards consumers (private sector customers) who will also be participating in IETF voting. I am trying to balance rapid development of standards using the IETF and complete vendor control of all standards. Once I see more consumer activity during voting, I will be more supportive of a large number of standards moving IETF. I know I am early and jumping the gun on this, but I just wanted to get my story out there. At this time no standards have been specifically identified and no specific action is required at this time. Aharon DTCC Non-Confidential (White) --------------------------------------------------- Michael "Aharon" Chernin Security Automation Program Manager Corporate Information Security -Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation O: 813-470-2173 From: Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com [mailto:Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 6:09 PM To: Chernin, Michael A.; scap_interest@ietf.org Subject: Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentially moving to IETF >From my perspective TBD. There are some that are unencumbered from and IPR perspective and those are potential candidates. Others will have to move as the appropriate consensus is achieved and IPR issues are addressed. The idea here from my perspective is to figure that out. Kent Landfield Director Content Strategy, Architecture and Standards McAfee | An Intel Company 5000 Headquarters Dr. Plano, Texas 75024 Direct: +1.972.963.7096 Mobile: +1.817.637.8026 Web: www.mcafee.com<http://www.mcafee.com/> From: Michael Aharon Chernin <mchernin@dtcc.com<mailto:mchernin@dtcc.com>> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:04:43 -0600 To: "scap_interest@ietf.org<mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>" <scap_interest@ietf.org<mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>> Subject: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentially moving to IETF I am just going to jump right on out there and ask. Which standards are we looking to go to IETF? Specific SCAP standards or the entire SCAP umbrella? Aharon DTCC Non-Confidential (White) --------------------------------------------------- Michael "Aharon" Chernin Security Automation Program Manager Corporate Information Security -Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation O: 813-470-2173 <BR>_____________________________________________________________ <FONT size=2><BR> DTCC DISCLAIMER: This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please notify us immediately and delete the email and any attachments from your system. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.</FONT> _______________________________________________ scap_interest mailing list scap_interest@ietf.org<mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest
- [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentially mo… Chernin, Michael A.
- Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentiall… Kent_Landfield
- Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentiall… Sean Turner
- Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentiall… Chernin, Michael A.
- Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentiall… david.oliva
- Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentiall… Adam Montville
- Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentiall… Kent_Landfield
- Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentiall… Sean Turner
- Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentiall… Kent_Landfield
- Re: [scap_interest] Scope of standards potentiall… douglas.m.taylor