[scap_interest] Security automation and MILE

<kathleen.moriarty@emc.com> Tue, 14 February 2012 14:47 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>
X-Original-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950ED21F8438 for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:47:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.885
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.885 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.714, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3iJJdYk8GE80 for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:47:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB6C121F8447 for <scap_interest@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:47:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si04.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI04.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.24]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q1EElRV8023063 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <scap_interest@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:47:28 -0500
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.145]) by hop04-l1d11-si04.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor) for <scap_interest@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:47:16 -0500
Received: from mxhub06.corp.emc.com (mxhub06.corp.emc.com [128.222.70.203]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id q1EElFvE004045 for <scap_interest@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:47:15 -0500
Received: from mx06a.corp.emc.com ([169.254.1.250]) by mxhub06.corp.emc.com ([128.222.70.203]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:47:15 -0500
From: kathleen.moriarty@emc.com
To: scap_interest@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 09:47:14 -0500
Thread-Topic: Security automation and MILE
Thread-Index: AczrJ4pesPMh69msRMi+ZqGu/Fvhtw==
Message-ID: <AE31510960917D478171C79369B660FA0E2F547B48@MX06A.corp.emc.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:52:29 -0800
Subject: [scap_interest] Security automation and MILE
X-BeenThere: scap_interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion List for IETFers interested in the Security Content Automation Protocol \(SCAP\)." <scap_interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scap_interest>
List-Post: <mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:47:29 -0000

Greetings,

In support of this effort, I plan to write and submit a draft very soon to show the relevance of this work to the IETF work in MILE.  The Structured Cybersecurity Information draft that extends IODEF is a very clear connection.  The GRC-Exchange work is another connection point.  Once I have it posted, I will share the link to this mailing list.

Best regards,
Kathleen