Re: [scap_interest] Just throwing this out there: Compliance Frameworks

Dorian Cougias <dcougias@unifiedcompliance.com> Wed, 15 February 2012 17:03 UTC

Return-Path: <dcougias@unifiedcompliance.com>
X-Original-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC9C21E809E for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:03:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.358
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.358 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.240, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id F4dsStINnVX7 for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:03:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sender1.zohomail.com (sender1.zohomail.com [72.5.230.95]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1F421E807C for <scap_interest@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:03:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.29.248.239 (172.29.248.239 [172.29.248.239]) by mx.zohomail.com with SMTP id 1329325423889220.95965020005826; Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:03:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:03:43 -0800
From: Dorian Cougias <dcougias@unifiedcompliance.com>
To: Adam Montville <amontville@tripwire.com>
Message-ID: <13581f83b6b.3618184224261303866.418390722739732418@unifiedcompliance.com>
In-Reply-To: <CB61228B.936C%amontville@tripwire.com>
References: <CB61228B.936C%amontville@tripwire.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_15078_1417880183.1329325423466"
X-Priority: Medium
User-Agent: Zoho Mail
X-Mailer: Zoho Mail
X-ZohoMail: Si CHF_MF_NL SS_10 UW48 UB48 UW48 UB48 SGR3_15022_268
X-Zoho-Virus-Status: 2
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:05:40 -0800
Cc: "cisaacs@unifiedcompliance.com" <cisaacs@unifiedcompliance.com>, "scap_interest@ietf.org" <scap_interest@ietf.org>, "CCI@disa.mil" <CCI@disa.mil>
Subject: Re: [scap_interest] Just throwing this out there: Compliance Frameworks
X-BeenThere: scap_interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion List for IETFers interested in the Security Content Automation Protocol \(SCAP\)." <scap_interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scap_interest>
List-Post: <mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:03:46 -0000

Yes. I've signed up on the list and will contribute as much as you'd like.

This might dovetail in very well with our Online Mapping Tool effort we are beginning to release this year.


Dorian J. Cougias
Compliance Scientist
Unified Compliance Framework



---- On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:53:02 -0800 Adam Montville&lt;amontville@tripwire.com&gtm&gt; wrote ---- 


Can we then expect that UCF will be contributing to the effort? I think our thoughts with respect to representing frameworks and controls would be well-informed by UCF's experience. 
 
Adam 
 
From: Dorian Cougias &lt;dcougias@unifiedcompliance.com&lt;mailto:dcougias@unifiedcompliance.com&gt;&gt; 
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:08:28 -0800 
To: Adam Montville &lt;amontville@tripwire.com&lt;mailto:amontville@tripwire.com&gt;&gt; 
Cc: &lt;CCI@disa.mil&lt;mailto:CCI@disa.mil&gt;&gt;, &lt;scap_interest@ietf.org&lt;mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org&gt;&gt;, kent_landfield &lt;kent_landfield@mcafee.com&lt;mailto:kent_landfield@mcafee.com&gt;&gt;, &lt;cisaacs@unifiedcompliance.com&lt;mailto:cisaacs@unifiedcompliance.com&gt;&gt; 
Subject: Re: FW: [scap_interest] Just throwing this out there: Compliance Frameworks