Re: [scap_interest] Putting SCAP to work

<Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com> Tue, 14 February 2012 21:29 UTC

Return-Path: <Kent_Landfield@mcafee.com>
X-Original-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9972621F8680 for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:29:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E2iemLowyxQW for <scap_interest@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:29:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dalsmrelay2.nai.com (dalsmrelay2.nai.com [205.227.136.216]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F6621F867F for <scap_interest@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:29:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (unknown [10.64.5.52]) by dalsmrelay2.nai.com with smtp id 0239_69ef_f9025c52_5752_11e1_93fc_00219b929abd; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:29:26 -0600
Received: from AMERDALEXMB1.corp.nai.org ([fe80::387d:3d79:ad3b:b517]) by DALEXHT2.corp.nai.org ([::1]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:29:26 -0600
From: <Kent_Landfield@McAfee.com>
To: <AKUNZ@mitre.org>, <scap_interest@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:29:59 -0600
Thread-Topic: [scap_interest] Putting SCAP to work
Thread-Index: AczrX7mrup/cayXYTZeCBSZNtFn7DA==
Message-ID: <CB602E4C.2C54C%kent_landfield@mcafee.com>
In-Reply-To: <A628BE896C976B4DB6DB2668E16338CB15A8F3@IMCMBX01.MITRE.ORG>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.14.0.111121
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CB602E4C2C54Ckentlandfieldmcafeecom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [scap_interest] Putting SCAP to work
X-BeenThere: scap_interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion List for IETFers interested in the Security Content Automation Protocol \(SCAP\)." <scap_interest.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scap_interest>
List-Post: <mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest>, <mailto:scap_interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:29:34 -0000

Hi Andrea,

Personally I would rather this list be about SCAP specifications and improving them, rather than specific products.  If you need to have a product dialog about PA or HBSS, I am all ears as that is my area and background. ;-) Please feel free to contact me offline. Info below.

Thanks!

Kent Landfield
Director Content Strategy, Architecture and Standards

McAfee | An Intel Company
5000 Headquarters Dr.
Plano, Texas 75024

Direct: +1.972.963.7096
Mobile: +1.817.637.8026
Web: www.mcafee.com<http://www.mcafee.com/>

From: "Kunz, Andrea A." <AKUNZ@mitre.org<mailto:AKUNZ@mitre.org>>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:06:47 -0600
To: "scap_interest@ietf.org<mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>" <scap_interest@ietf.org<mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>>
Subject: [scap_interest] Putting SCAP to work

If this mail group is open to all items related to SCAP, I'd like to put in my two cents for the places where it is currently being used, or at least, where it's ready to be used.

If anyone out there has practical experience with or awareness of  the HBSS Policy Auditor and how it works with XCCDF Benchmarks and OVAL policy, I would definitely like to engage in some discourse.

Andrea


_______________________________________________
scap_interest mailing list
scap_interest@ietf.org<mailto:scap_interest@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scap_interest