IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [scim] Consistent Paged Results - Question for the group

Kelly Grizzle <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com> Wed, 03 April 2013 15:54 UTC

Return-Path: <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E1BB21F8F44 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:54:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9JteDW-jm5nv for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD9621F8F29 for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 08:54:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail9-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.236) by CO9EHSOBE022.bigfish.com (10.236.130.85) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:54:17 +0000
Received: from mail9-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail9-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C46C5C400F9; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:54:17 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -22
X-BigFish: PS-22(zz9371I542Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz1033IL8275dh18602eh8275bhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1155h)
Received-SPF: softfail (mail9-co9: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail9-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail9-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 1365004411838226_9577; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:53:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO9EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.248]) by mail9-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E86AC00AB; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:53:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by CO9EHSMHS011.bigfish.com (10.236.130.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:53:31 +0000
Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.102]) by BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.165]) with mapi id 14.16.0287.008; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:53:28 +0000
From: Kelly Grizzle <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com>
To: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>, "scim@ietf.org WG" <scim@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [scim] Consistent Paged Results - Question for the group
Thread-Index: AQHOMIMgbBXKRQdf30CjItFaei9KE5jEpZPg
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:53:27 +0000
Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C5D97@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <07AE5038-B4A5-4AB7-8A22-5BF8D15D7F3F@oracle.com>
In-Reply-To: <07AE5038-B4A5-4AB7-8A22-5BF8D15D7F3F@oracle.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-vipre-scanned: 3671AFCC00408E3671B119
x-originating-ip: [173.226.147.242]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com
Subject: Re: [scim] Consistent Paged Results - Question for the group
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:54:19 -0000

> 1.  Need a method for reconciliation (which may use paging or some other method)

Yes

> 2.  Have another reason for wanting consistent paged results.

No

--Kelly


-----Original Message-----
From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Phil Hunt
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 10:51 AM
To: scim@ietf.org WG
Subject: [scim] Consistent Paged Results - Question for the group

At the Orlando meeting I proposed that Ticket 31 (Support for Consistent Paged Results) be dropped due to unclear need.

The feedback from those present was that more information was desired.

One use case we have talked about for consistent results is to reconcile data in the cloud and in particular detect deletions that have or have not occurred and thus are out of sync with the service provider.  

Just to get a better feel for this issue (ticket 31) do you:

1.  Need a method for reconciliation (which may use paging or some other method) 2.  Have another reason for wanting consistent paged results.  If so, can you describe it?

Phil

@independentid
www.independentid.com
phil.hunt@oracle.com





_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email