IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [scim] Schema URIs

Kelly Grizzle <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com> Thu, 04 April 2013 15:56 UTC

Return-Path: <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EE021F8CE8 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:56:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t3GFNj0IhM4l for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch1outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (ch1ehsobe004.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.181.184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9CB21F8C93 for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 08:56:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail212-ch1-R.bigfish.com (10.43.68.238) by CH1EHSOBE001.bigfish.com (10.43.70.51) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:10 +0000
Received: from mail212-ch1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail212-ch1-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133CB30013A; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:10 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:132.245.1.133; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: -33
X-BigFish: PS-33(zzbb2dI98dI154cP9371I542I1432Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ahzz8275ch1033IL17326ah8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd25hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh15d0h162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1155h)
Received-SPF: softfail (mail212-ch1: transitioning domain of sailpoint.com does not designate 132.245.1.133 as permitted sender) client-ip=132.245.1.133; envelope-from=kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com; helo=BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
Received: from mail212-ch1 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail212-ch1 (MessageSwitch) id 136509096670069_8364; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CH1EHSMHS018.bigfish.com (snatpool1.int.messaging.microsoft.com [10.43.68.247]) by mail212-ch1.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D417E0047; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com (132.245.1.133) by CH1EHSMHS018.bigfish.com (10.43.70.18) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:04 +0000
Received: from BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.4.102]) by BLUPRD0412HT004.namprd04.prod.outlook.com ([10.255.214.165]) with mapi id 14.16.0287.008; Thu, 4 Apr 2013 15:56:03 +0000
From: Kelly Grizzle <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>, Keith Hazelton <hazelton@wisc.edu>
Thread-Topic: [scim] Schema URIs
Thread-Index: AQHOMLxI2cybutQ4aUWSWVQOyu9hfpjFVNEAgADiYQA=
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:56:02 +0000
Message-ID: <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3C7493@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
References: <58CD0C9D-52AA-4BBA-B8D1-9C5905F7C6C9@wisc.edu> <515CE3B6.1050609@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <515CE3B6.1050609@stpeter.im>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-vipre-scanned: 3B9A66980040A63B9A67E5
x-originating-ip: [173.226.147.242]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: sailpoint.com
Cc: "cifer-prov@internet2.edu" <cifer-prov@internet2.edu>, scim WG <scim@ietf.org>, "cifer-api@internet2.edu discussion" <cifer-api@internet2.edu>
Subject: Re: [scim] Schema URIs
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:56:12 -0000

> Also, a formal URN namespace was never issued for 'scim': ... Am I missing something?

You're right.  This still needs to happen.

>> We're contemplating some schema extensions for the higher ed and 
>> research space and our first choice would be to use URLs rather than 
>> URNs to identify our extensions.  Is this likely to cause us any 
>> problems?
>
> No.

I don't see any problems with this.  In section 4, the schema draft says: "Each schema extension must identify a URI used to identify the extension."  To me, this means that a URL or URN would be valid.

--Kelly

-----Original Message-----
From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Peter Saint-Andre
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2013 9:22 PM
To: Keith Hazelton
Cc: cifer-prov@internet2.edu; scim WG; cifer-api@internet2.edu discussion
Subject: Re: [scim] Schema URIs

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 4/3/13 4:40 PM, Keith Hazelton wrote:
> I notice that up to now all published SCIM schema URIs are URNs, e.g., 
> urn:scim:schema:core:1.0

I don't see those documented anywhere. Also, a formal URN namespace was never issued for 'scim':

https://www.iana.org/assignments/urn-namespaces/urn-namespaces.xml

Am I missing something?

> We're contemplating some schema extensions for the higher ed and 
> research space and our first choice would be to use URLs rather than 
> URNs to identify our extensions.  Is this likely to cause us any 
> problems?

No.

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
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=m0QM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email