Re: [scim] Poll for December meeting

Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com> Tue, 22 November 2022 22:10 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAGBSGjofEjEtt+ud7JzHkFAHAp-2Wx1MDiPB1nNNYXp_Yqk1sQ@mail.gmail.com> <0E0818E1-172E-48EE-A9D5-DE8C77460D0B@amazon.com>
In-Reply-To: <0E0818E1-172E-48EE-A9D5-DE8C77460D0B@amazon.com>
From: Aaron Parecki <aaron@parecki.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:09:45 -0800
Message-ID: <CAGBSGjpSmBMymfhcbsCe6=k=BDrmgozV4NCD5=pCnFsnzDk-0g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Saxe, Dean" <deansaxe=40amazon.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
Cc: SCIM WG <scim@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000a4403805ee166ec6"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/BzVCsFCooJwSL-sVfndeiwEBiWc>
Subject: Re: [scim] Poll for December meeting
Precedence: list

I was just looking at the results, and given the relatively small number of
responses and the lack of a clear winner for a time so far, I agree let's
keep it open for a little longer.

I've re-opened the poll, and it will close on Tuesday 8am Pacific time.
That gives people the rest of this week as well as Monday next week to
respond, and still leaves about a week before the meeting time. I'll send
out the meeting invite on Tuesday the 29th.

https://strawpoll.com/polls/6QnM7z6OkZe

Thanks!

Aaron

On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 2:06 PM Saxe, Dean <deansaxe=
40amazon.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> Aaron,
>
>
>
> Thanks for setting this up.  Given the small number of respondents, does
> it make sense to reopen this for a few more days before we choose a date on
> the week of December 6?
>
>
>
> -dhs
>
>
>
> *--*
>
> *Dean H. Saxe, CIDPRO <https://idpro.org/cidpro/> (he/him)*
>
> Senior Security Engineer, AWS Identity Trust Team | Amazon Web Services
> (AWS)
>
> E: deansaxe@amazon.com | M: 206-659-7293
>
>
>
> *From: *scim <scim-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Aaron Parecki <aaron=
> 40parecki.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Date: *Monday, November 14, 2022 at 12:30 PM
> *To: *SCIM WG <scim@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] [scim] Poll for December meeting
>
>
>
> *CAUTION*: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
> click links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know
> the content is safe.
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
>
>
> There was enough interest during the sessions at IETF 115 to restart a
> series of regular meetings again. Given that many people will be away for
> the Thanksgiving and winter holidays coming up, I thought we could schedule
> one meeting in December, and then settle on a regular biweekly time
> starting in January.
>
>
>
> Here is a poll to find a time for a meeting the first week of December.
> Please fill out your availability so I can schedule this and send out the
> invites.
>
>
>
> https://strawpoll.com/polls/6QnM7z6OkZe
>
>
>
> The poll will close at the end of Friday this week.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
> ---
>
> Aaron Parecki
>
>
>

[scim] Poll for December meeting Aaron Parecki
Re: [scim] Poll for December meeting Saxe, Dean
Re: [scim] Poll for December meeting Aaron Parecki