Re: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call

Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com> Thu, 11 April 2013 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4144121F8550 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.698, BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ormb+cHvVJG9 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2CA721F852A for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet21.oracle.com (ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]) by aserp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r3BGTaZM027014 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:29:37 GMT
Received: from userz7021.oracle.com (userz7021.oracle.com [156.151.31.85]) by ucsinet21.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3BGTZ8b020127 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:29:35 GMT
Received: from abhmt108.oracle.com (abhmt108.oracle.com [141.146.116.60]) by userz7021.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3BGTZ7A020114; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:29:35 GMT
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:34 -0700
References: <5165AEC0.5000008@mnt.se> <56C3C758F9D6534CA3778EAA1E0C34375C3CE9D3@BLUPRD0412MB643.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> <5166E29B.5010804@mnt.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <5166E29B.5010804@mnt.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <750BC2F0-E826-488D-83CA-94739339B1E9@oracle.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329)
From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:29:32 -0700
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Source-IP: ucsinet21.oracle.com [156.151.31.93]
Cc: scim WG <scim@ietf.org>, Kelly Grizzle <kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com>
Subject: Re: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 16:29:40 -0000

Yes, I presented root search as optional. In the particular section below I was attempting to make clear what are now valid queries. However it missed the issue of whether the server supports it. 

Phil

On 2013-04-11, at 9:19, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:

> On 04/11/2013 06:08 PM, Kelly Grizzle wrote:
>> I agree with everything in the proposal except for one thing:
>> 
>>  Queries MAY be performed against a SCIM:
>>  <list>
>>    <t>Resource (e.g. /Users/{userid}),</t>
>>    <t>Resource Type endpoint (e.g. /Users or /Groups), or</t>
>>    <t>Server Root (e.g. /).</t>
>>  </list>
>> 
>> IMO querying against the server root should be optional and that SP's should declare support in ServiceProviderConfig.  For directory-backed datastores, this will be easy to support.  However, if the SP is using a relational database backed datastore, this could be difficult to implement in a way that scales.
> I suggest you update the ticket so that the proposal is clear - I
> believe this was
> already covered in Orlando though.
>> 
>> --Kelly
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leif Johansson
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 1:26 PM
>> To: scim WG
>> Subject: [scim] Issue#25 consensus call
>> 
>> 
>> Folks,
>> 
>> At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing
>> 25 as suggested in the issue tracker.
>> 
>> This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now if you disagree.
>> 
>>        Leif & Morteza
>> _______________________________________________
>> scim mailing list
>> scim@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
> 
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim