IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [scim] SCIM v3?

Phillip Hunt <phil.hunt@independentid.com> Sat, 06 June 2020 19:32 UTC

Return-Path: <phil.hunt@independentid.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19683A0ACC for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 12:32:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.894
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.894 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=independentid-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GvyIoYeeC5_W for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 12:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x531.google.com (mail-pg1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AA5E3A0ACF for <scim@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 12:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x531.google.com with SMTP id r18so528227pgk.11 for <scim@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=independentid-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version:subject:date:message-id :references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=y9thpnhWZQc3N/J7Xk6R32m/8Y50d3z9WvaERK+zlgw=; b=z3YoQJDXMjpTBxArY8dvtujncoiiig6nEwVCu+7bv92NjJQ8Ghfm9f7ZXBJOax2fEf RgUyvDGhdrV16+eL9oeGQ8h186xRhaLT/06CzV4PkrNO0aUCJPFPV5vYI8NqrRoA5I+Z rx6jjeUtAD4xrJVQLWlCeGBPeEemVP2w12Pw2LKHMCXKnas9H1+ZZLLNJ/SoyyQWLkos wkUxZRYswqFyEQxeCz/uVjApVieozCVs9gBWMLUeE8BW08vTAonrzT2r3Ph+u6kve5e/ jJQYMbOxu+8f3dmfPEEVvNDWPLvNwKcJG7kTAhvehpGchiBt5vv6PXPQFpnAjwDrYMuJ UHDg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:content-transfer-encoding:from:mime-version :subject:date:message-id:references:cc:in-reply-to:to; bh=y9thpnhWZQc3N/J7Xk6R32m/8Y50d3z9WvaERK+zlgw=; b=haDuQhQnsyVS7p8a0XqbeMzgYZNhmZPXew4w8nawG+sO4vMdHuWDK14iJYR2OWXO4L prZRSlEG05Iqr8xj2VmUEudNQmz1nhDxqBS6PNYTSW1KM4vjUcFkwW9BjQB6nSt/FEt5 tJtI2KVT9rRy41RkEIzfEiUleKd7CKExQLCbzWhu3gscvIaF1jEYUQkAcWj7b9afo3si 3vnMTBIFCD2VlzNdOCUIn7wK3ozVg7Gy1CXoeUFg1/FHolgceMK2zF/cmAgNcSO7gspW sMic2fZhC+8i4NB6AkeU4turEbgOUXQLwyKF5f0dB7TdOmt2JLXHXUpdJkoTYbBOqnAw xI5g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533x7VSM8b8aHV/VgB18i6yHlgmMyWI8V1Ph3bHupg5h8dxUJ/IB K0cospsoapfcwJulRQESBs4i/OtHSLo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwNZDszTuNGqjRzsHdu+COvx4Xe7orQvF/5S3p9m/9GQ7sWxCnCv/+Dw4y2OAIdrZESfv1rsg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:ce0d:: with SMTP id y13mr14237268pgf.90.1591471935233; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:569:7a71:1d00:b46a:222c:d535:37a0? (node-1w7jr9qrfoxxa9np13f4fbzj4.ipv6.telus.net. [2001:569:7a71:1d00:b46a:222c:d535:37a0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x11sm2912959pfq.169.2020.06.06.12.32.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:32:14 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-A18BB65C-DF92-47C4-991B-29A5EF28B70F"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Phillip Hunt <phil.hunt@independentid.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 12:32:14 -0700
Message-Id: <FC4D62F8-A64E-4160-AEC4-EE1B8285C9A9@independentid.com>
References: <CAD65AC4-F57E-473E-A345-E066FDD1EA06@darranrolls.com>
Cc: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAD65AC4-F57E-473E-A345-E066FDD1EA06@darranrolls.com>
To: Darran Rolls <me@darranrolls.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (17E262)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/DCf1scrqtpTh3lxNKpXueBVcEqE>
Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM v3?
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 19:32:19 -0000

Darran

Good to hear!

I am not sure these items require a v3. I believe these all can be done via extensions thus maintaining backwards compatibility. 

For example I did submit a proposal for paged attributes based on the current drafts. 

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hunt-scim-mv-paging-00

I think we have to see if there is sufficient interest to charter a WG and determine interest in specific items. 

Another long term issue compliance issues. For this we to find an independent organization to develop and host an interop test suite as compliance testing is not something the IETF does.  This will likely require direct donation of funds and time. This is how things happened for OIDC testing. 

Phil Hunt

> On Jun 6, 2020, at 10:15 AM, Darran Rolls <me@darranrolls.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello SCIM folks,
>  
> To introduce myself to the group, up until March of this year I was the CTO at SailPoint and worked with Kelly Grizzle and Matt Domsch on all things identity standards.  I'm now consulting and engaging on various projects around the IAM space.  
>  
> Having chatted with Leif and Morteza directly, I wanted to bring a discussion back here to the full WG alias.  As several of you will already know, I’d like to formally make a request to re-chartering this WG.  The goal of the WG would be to address the ratification of the following work items: 
>  
> Protocol /operational enhancements
> Multi-value paging & cursor pagination
> Relying party user provisioning
> Soft Delete
> Interop and testing capabilities
> New schema to address
> Extended HR /user data and related action events
> Ratification of extension to address Privilege Account Management user cases
>  
> I therefore seek your comments and input on this  proposal.  Are you interested to participate?  What is missing from the above list of work items?  Is there support for an informal interest-group call sometime in the next two weeks?
>  
> Thanks
> Darran
>  
> -- 
> https://www.darranrolls.com
> LinkedIn @djrolls
>  
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email