Re: [scim] Moving towards the next IETF Meeting

+1, I'm also interested

On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 12:03 PM <scim-request@ietf.org> wrote:

> Send scim mailing list submissions to
>         scim@ietf.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         scim-request@ietf.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         scim-owner@ietf.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of scim digest..."
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Moving towards the next IETF Meeting (Pamela Dingle)
>    2. PRECIS questions (Sarah Mundy)
>    3. Re: Moving towards the next IETF Meeting (Paul Lanzi)
>    4. Re: Moving towards the next IETF Meeting (Darran Rolls)
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Pamela Dingle <Pamela.Dingle@microsoft.com>
> To: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 15:34:59 +0000
> Subject: [scim] Moving towards the next IETF Meeting
> Hi SCIM working group,
>
> I would like to propose we get together to do three things:
>
> 1) Share each of our goals for where SCIM can go
>
> 2) Find the commonalities
>
> 3) Create a roadmap for the time between now and the next IETF meeting to
> achieve those goals
>
> I will find a time, is there interest?
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Sarah Mundy <the.sarah.mundy@gmail.com>
> To: scim@ietf.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 08:22:03 -0700
> Subject: [scim] PRECIS questions
> Hi all,
>
> A couple of questions about PRECIS string comparison for SCIM 2.0:
>
> 1. The SCIM 2.0 spec references RFCs 7564 and 7613, which are obsolete
> drafts of PRECIS. Are folks instead using the final versions, RFCs 8264 and
> 8265?
>
> 2. Can anyone point me to a stable, open-source library of PRECIS tools,
> preferably in Java? What are other server implementers using? I haven't
> been able to find anything but maybe I am not using the right keywords in
> my searches.
>
> Thanks,
> Sarah
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Paul Lanzi <paul@remediant.com>
> To: Pamela Dingle <Pamela.Dingle=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 08:39:28 -0700
> Subject: Re: [scim] Moving towards the next IETF Meeting
> Hi Pam - certainly would be interested.
>
> --Paul
> ᐧ
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:37 AM Pamela Dingle <Pamela.Dingle=
> 40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi SCIM working group,
>>
>> I would like to propose we get together to do three things:
>>
>> 1) Share each of our goals for where SCIM can go
>>
>> 2) Find the commonalities
>>
>> 3) Create a roadmap for the time between now and the next IETF meeting to
>> achieve those goals
>>
>> I will find a time, is there interest?
>> _______________________________________________
>> scim mailing list
>> scim@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Darran Rolls <me@darranrolls.com>
> To: Paul Lanzi <paul@remediant.com>, Pamela Dingle <Pamela.Dingle=
> 40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> Cc: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
> Bcc:
> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 16:03:16 +0000
> Subject: Re: [scim] Moving towards the next IETF Meeting
>
> Me2.
>
>
>
> I’ve not shared the results of our “I’m interested to contribute here”
> analysis – I’ll do that now – that’s a key input into this process.  In
> summary there are gaps but commonality and lots to do…
>
>
>
> Darran
>
>
>
> *From: *scim <scim-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Paul Lanzi <
> paul@remediant.com>
> *Date: *Wednesday, September 9, 2020 at 10:55 AM
> *To: *Pamela Dingle <Pamela.Dingle=40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Cc: *"scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Re: [scim] Moving towards the next IETF Meeting
>
>
>
> Hi Pam - certainly would be interested.
>
>
>
> --Paul
>
> [image: Image removed by sender.]ᐧ
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:37 AM Pamela Dingle <Pamela.Dingle=
> 40microsoft.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Hi SCIM working group,
>
>
>
> I would like to propose we get together to do three things:
>
>
>
> 1) Share each of our goals for where SCIM can go
>
>
>
> 2) Find the commonalities
>
>
>
> 3) Create a roadmap for the time between now and the next IETF meeting to
> achieve those goals
>
>
>
> I will find a time, is there interest?
>
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>