Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite?

Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se> Tue, 07 February 2017 07:36 UTC

Return-Path: <samuel@erdtman.se>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB375129A9A for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:36:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=erdtman-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kx8ekRea31BZ for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34AC012009C for <scim@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Feb 2017 23:36:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id j15so60305401oih.2 for <scim@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 23:36:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=erdtman-se.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=aYGR1wcUYbqJ4GqRrYBncM28sdLvt5Il8SDdV+bSXYg=; b=B2CKRPT31rL7ZXI2XKkogNulnbWOYdyZPK7EQXRdUTLlembziXsT9bmYw+ynr4w9TJ xbqYJ0efQoI5y86FCrZLjbH7+/FlJDFf0ye5GOYqqxM2cRMghqw9//yBHY4tROWHNOUe 5N1JvWTb/UuA7GQZaB4AuNAG7q1kNzp7CGJAO6aXBwbPQH4uhnCv34GK4ZdzLP88s/xL RR7TvCA1qTgHaKFJRLH+oAyzvIaBErG4V5zjMoXMfgSK+Az0MmgzQDJc9wR3ZEz+5akL thPu8P+G/Hwlxc7IoToUuZUwco5/rcPmcAG4mPvcgE7vbFriLsiy1AgTMUpr3PImPpOW jTRg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=aYGR1wcUYbqJ4GqRrYBncM28sdLvt5Il8SDdV+bSXYg=; b=o4G/4K5n9+eMnnWVbzf01vRXg/cOFwNoWrZeOnJ98MwttAUyq0SwrJBGdfPVSKE5pq kB37yMLtzfx9DMtdNLsDS0uW5ynfQMPeieo4aHyX5YcoZLEMbLrsepBpsxt2w3NQ4HKb LjiK+L2ISVVlmUagSUxlEUUoknfinTAUBuu1NUthVNKvqzPWFYmwS8UmilVUIykGBL1t zC7RblHf/XPGNkpzlo5Rg8jTZhNaBhXGlBYAKRC5sS+dptboFEXIvXx7qth6ILKlEPAS cbj23yh1qe4lYPS+zCSAOcWxbHZBRDjLtH+RXgClRAJTLcznksHwuz5jiIYH4A0yHVxB ZZBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mxeXLmsFpBSLmf6M8IhQ1D6slaDQVNaZChuZopEJkmsRKvbRYD5b9HpTQXEG7FfhaVsf2dN0EG4vSbFA==
X-Received: by 10.202.8.71 with SMTP id 68mr7331015oii.59.1486453005550; Mon, 06 Feb 2017 23:36:45 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAN2oXrCHc3OFoUWf+TUSZTO+OAU2iLmZ+MfRMbgT0uRyzFFuHQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN2oXrCHc3OFoUWf+TUSZTO+OAU2iLmZ+MfRMbgT0uRyzFFuHQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Samuel Erdtman <samuel@erdtman.se>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 07:36:34 +0000
Message-ID: <CAF2hCbZ-6vtKELAdgeaeg-iyEpHb-ZS0PQshNg0VuxUa1We7hA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com>, "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c12f8b45f2a290547ebcf9c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/GZWSyrdNYoodgH3Ba4FSAzg2WWI>
Cc: omindu.dishan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [scim] Does SCIM 2.0 have a compliance test suite?
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2017 07:36:52 -0000

There is currently no such tool as far as I know.

That it says ongoing is a bit too optimistic, there is no ongoing work as
far as I know.

You are not the only one asking for this so maybe a few persons could do
some cooperation and create something.


On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 at 07:37, Darshana Gunawardana <darshanasbg@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Is there a test tool that can used to check compliance with the SCIM 2.0
> specification?
>
> The site [1] specifies that there is an ongoing effort. Is this an open
> source effort where someone interested can try prototype versions and
> contribute for the development?
>
> [1] http://www.simplecloud.info/
> [2] "Work on SCIM 2.0 tests is under development and there are currently
> no support for the enterprise extension"
>
> Thanks,
> --
> With Regards,
>
> Darshana Gunawardana,
> Alumni : Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering,
> University of Moratuwa,
> Sri Lanka
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>