Re: [scim] Proposal to create a design team

Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com> Thu, 18 October 2012 16:37 UTC

Return-Path: <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4304521F86FE for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.528
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.528 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.071, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 946LcGU8To2m for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE26221F86EC for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id fb11so8424434pad.31 for <scim@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=b7201AO2PkQ5+CdjO14reAgzy2AaBtQs5qrwSHmO5Q0=; b=D3Tfue9Cgm95+CCBiMuQ3HnG29HMlHQjBC7miN/oWfDjwZBbSMmW66/AYm7PAxDdSp CfzOTSB69lZ3kE+o6TpjvSq1HxkLoWxB6VnS/q2RmgXH4MUwEm4q9KWsvnodJV6ge6we CHDAPevQPKpToV2GjAw220OzPAQmioAbddfdS0SFpO5HYGLycnReFMtsrTsQK9o06Oo9 gToU0wI4QOcG9Iy9KdZGaL70t1ihrhZmK+rUSe1OXzKEuvKKhnP+QvPLh72ptrlBtxLo fdilZM7oCcbYwxSBl7tGsZUEPD4oqGdJvUr4qSFD8h0LJQZj/psUkr9dVp52aODOT4PL LHyg==
Received: by 10.68.132.165 with SMTP id ov5mr66878859pbb.105.1350578224491; Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:37:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spandex.local (66-230-86-185-rb1.fai.dsl.dynamic.acsalaska.net. [66.230.86.185]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id sz4sm14473507pbc.22.2012.10.18.09.37.02 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 18 Oct 2012 09:37:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5080302D.5060708@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 08:37:01 -0800
From: Melinda Shore <melinda.shore@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <CA3B67220D628A4780D6FEB31F18A3E32379CB76@xmb-rcd-x08.cisco.com> <50766F04.6090901@gmx.net> <507691DB.1050204@mnt.se> <50802113.4040805@cisco.com> <5080217D.7010703@stpeter.im>
In-Reply-To: <5080217D.7010703@stpeter.im>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>, Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>, scim@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [scim] Proposal to create a design team
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2012 16:37:05 -0000

On 10/18/12 7:34 AM, Peter Saint-Andre wrote:
> And given that half of the semi-active WG participants seem to have
> volunteered to be on the design team, we might consider just doing the
> work in the WG as a whole. :-)

I'd be a little surprised if half the volunteers for the design team
actually do end up writing text, etc.  There's a general problem of how
to progress work in the IETF, since it seems like we're getting less
done between meetings and seem to have morphed into a meeting-driven
organization.  I really don't like interims, since (among
other things) I think reliance on them tends to exclude smaller
companies with crappy travel budgets from the process, and that's not
okay.  Design teams with regular calls can achieve much the same thing
as an interim meeting, and as long as the process is transparent
there's little risk of taking the work in a direction the group would
otherwise not support.  I agree there needs to be clear - and
specific - goals, though.

Melinda