IETF Logo Mail Archive

[scim] Schema URIs

Keith Hazelton <hazelton@wisc.edu> Wed, 03 April 2013 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <hazelton@wisc.edu>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96BCC21F902D for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iw22M-0oOz1d for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:40:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (wmauth3.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.226]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0275D21F9012 for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 15:40:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"
Received: from avs-daemon.smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) id <0MKP00400AWXW100@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for scim@ietf.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:40:39 -0500 (CDT)
X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-3, Version=5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2013.4.3.223316, SenderIP=0.0.0.0
Received: from dyn-128-104-18-253.doit.wisc.edu (dyn-128-104-18-253.doit.wisc.edu [128.104.18.253]) by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.01(7.0.4.27.0) 64bit (built Aug 30 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0MKP004BEAZQ2600@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:40:39 -0500 (CDT)
From: Keith Hazelton <hazelton@wisc.edu>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 17:40:22 -0500
Message-id: <58CD0C9D-52AA-4BBA-B8D1-9C5905F7C6C9@wisc.edu>
To: scim WG <scim@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503)
Cc: "cifer-prov@internet2.edu" <cifer-prov@internet2.edu>, "cifer-api@internet2.edu discussion" <cifer-api@internet2.edu>
Subject: [scim] Schema URIs
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 22:40:41 -0000

I notice that up to now all published SCIM schema URIs are URNs, e.g., urn:scim:schema:core:1.0

We're contemplating some schema extensions for the higher ed and research space and our first choice would be to use URLs rather than URNs to identify our extensions.  Is this likely to cause us any problems? It would seem to be spec-conformant.

E.g. http://ciferproject.org/schema/ciferRegistry/1.0

        --Keith

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email