IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [scim] issue #28 consensus call

Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com> Wed, 10 April 2013 21:03 UTC

Return-Path: <tonynad@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A40B721F8B0C for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.533
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.533 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, UNRESOLVED_TEMPLATE=3.132]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DeBCKQWfaDjn for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2lp0211.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.211]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 038F221F8ACD for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 14:03:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BL2FFO11FD023.protection.gbl (10.173.161.200) by BL2FFO11HUB010.protection.gbl (10.173.161.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:03:23 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.37) by BL2FFO11FD023.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.173.161.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.664.0 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:03:23 +0000
Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (157.54.51.81) by mail.microsoft.com (157.54.80.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:03:05 +0000
Received: from mail71-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.246) by VA3EHSOBE009.bigfish.com (10.7.40.29) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:15 +0000
Received: from mail71-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail71-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59404300A9D for <scim@ietf.org.FOPE.CONNECTOR.OVERRIDE>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:15 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: CIP:157.56.240.21; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); (null); H:BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; R:internal; EFV:INT
X-SpamScore: -35
X-BigFish: PS-35(z21aILz9371I542Izz1f42h1fc6h1ee6h1de0h1fdah1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1082kzz1033IL8275dhz31h2a8h668h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h1ad9h1b0ah17ej9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: softfail (mail71-va3: transitioning domain of microsoft.com does not designate 157.56.240.21 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.21; envelope-from=tonynad@microsoft.com; helo=BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:SKI; SFS:; DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:-1; SRVR:BY2PR03MB042; H:BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; LANG:en;
Received: from mail71-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail71-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 136562767325468_31257; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS026.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.235]) by mail71-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F322D10009A; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:12 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.21) by VA3EHSMHS026.bigfish.com (10.7.99.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:11 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.146) by BL2PRD0310HT002.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.97.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.287.3; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:08 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.145) by BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.255.241.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.670.13; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:06 +0000
Received: from BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) by BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.8.206]) with mapi id 15.00.0670.000; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:06 +0000
From: Anthony Nadalin <tonynad@microsoft.com>
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>, scim WG <scim@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [scim] issue #28 consensus call
Thread-Index: AQHONhoQ143okI8WGU+u7V5z1EAD4JjP8M0Q
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:01:05 +0000
Message-ID: <bf8a9ac65f7f41678e54f00b7fdc3b0f@BY2PR03MB041.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <5165B088.2010602@mnt.se>
In-Reply-To: <5165B088.2010602@mnt.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [2001:4898:2a:2:b871:c3d1:a1c1:99cb]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OrganizationHeadersPreserved: BY2PR03MB042.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%IETF.ORG$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%59$Dn%MNT.SE$RO%2$TLS%6$FQDN%corpf5vips-237160.customer.frontbridge.com$TlsDn%
X-CrossPremisesHeadersPromoted: TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-CrossPremisesHeadersFiltered: TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.37; CTRY:US; IPV:CAL; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(189002)(199002)(13464002)(5383001)(377454001)(5343655001)(79102001)(31966008)(33646001)(69226001)(46102001)(50986001)(77982001)(53806001)(56816002)(80022001)(16676001)(56776001)(76482001)(46406002)(6806001)(74502001)(20776003)(47976001)(49866001)(81542001)(74662001)(47446002)(63696002)(23726001)(44976002)(81342001)(47736001)(4396001)(54356001)(54316002)(65816001)(51856001)(59766001)(47776003)(50466001)(42262001)(3826001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BL2FFO11HUB010; H:TK5EX14HUBC107.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:InfoDomainNonexistent; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.onmicrosoft.com
X-Forefront-PRVS: 0812095267
Subject: Re: [scim] issue #28 consensus call
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:03:25 -0000

+1

-----Original Message-----
From: scim-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:scim-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leif Johansson
Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 11:34 AM
To: scim WG
Subject: [scim] issue #28 consensus call


Folks,

At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing
28 by including a non-normative text in the spec explaining how multi- tenacy could be implemented.

This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now if you disagree.

        Leif & Morteza
_______________________________________________
scim mailing list
scim@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email