Re: [scim] SCIM v3?

Hi Darran and Phil,

I am interested in being part of this discussion. I work for a company that
regularly uses the SCIM protocol and we have a use for a number of the
extensions Darran suggested above.

Best,
Paul

Paul Logston
(510) 755 - 4474
paul.logston@gmail.com
linkedin.com/in/paullogston <https://www.linkedin.com/in/paullogston/>

On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:32 AM Phillip Hunt <phil.hunt@independentid.com>
wrote:

> Darran
>
> Good to hear!
>
> I am not sure these items require a v3. I believe these all can be done
> via extensions thus maintaining backwards compatibility.
>
> For example I did submit a proposal for paged attributes based on the
> current drafts.
>
> https://tools..ietf.org/html/draft-hunt-scim-mv-paging-00
> <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hunt-scim-mv-paging-00>
>
> I think we have to see if there is sufficient interest to charter a WG and
> determine interest in specific items.
>
> Another long term issue compliance issues. For this we to find an
> independent organization to develop and host an interop test suite as
> compliance testing is not something the IETF does.  This will likely
> require direct donation of funds and time. This is how things happened for
> OIDC testing.
>
> Phil Hunt
>
> On Jun 6, 2020, at 10:15 AM, Darran Rolls <me@darranrolls.com> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Hello SCIM folks,
>
>
>
> To introduce myself to the group, up until March of this year I was the
> CTO at SailPoint and worked with Kelly Grizzle and Matt Domsch on all
> things identity standards.  I'm now consulting and engaging on various
> projects around the IAM space.
>
>
>
> Having chatted with Leif and Morteza directly, I wanted to bring a
> discussion back here to the full WG alias.  As several of you will already
> know, I’d like to formally make a request to re-chartering this WG.  The
> goal of the WG would be to address the ratification of the following work
> items:
>
>
>
>    - Protocol /operational enhancements
>       - Multi-value paging & cursor pagination
>       - Relying party user provisioning
>       - Soft Delete
>       - Interop and testing capabilities
>    - New schema to address
>       - Extended HR /user data and related action events
>       - Ratification of extension to address Privilege Account Management
>       user cases
>
>
>
> I therefore seek your comments and input on this  proposal.  Are you
> interested to participate?  What is missing from the above list of work
> items?  Is there support for an informal interest-group call sometime in
> the next two weeks?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Darran
>
>
>
> --
>
> https://www.darranrolls.com
>
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/darran-rolls-068b84> @djrolls
> <https://twitter.com/djrolls>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
>