Re: [scim] SCIM Soft Delete

Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@yahoo.com> Tue, 14 January 2020 23:40 UTC

Return-Path: <phil.hunt@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80C8A120BEC for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:40:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yahoo.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Z79AYP1PiSd2 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:40:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sonic306-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (sonic306-22.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [66.163.189.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D74EA120C35 for <scim@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:40:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1579045240; bh=Zl4DtSnTQSrWxi0xc6JtrgP3U9m4+bAoU9GiVgdv1vU=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To:From:Subject; b=Y1wb2bBenT/GvTTa06YO5Hb8ue54U0rBnLUaZWUUlUIqIEPhXKs1Kth2fjBk2jlG/I4NN2jLIRJBl/Tj2SJsQ18ZsERH7jshiVM2KgacLHNXDh7uWe4kXTh08QIuCVku1nqxCYEiVBVi1hCd7UYO2CzchtVvPklj5ZIKU0YpqhCHUphtAolFwNF17Oy5TRpWO4osIjvXTug8n7EVdX+SU3fZQwk402a1nypDFhxda+ykCfqNTuAtt8atnmTOCcRCa9OQ693lmKeaxKd2/iYP73wtBnlUTIiFNH1b6UXOnXCd6cW7B+MKyMfJPcpBXarkuB6wHCzJNNo1x46BON2FYw==
X-YMail-OSG: FmRL9cYVM1k0E0mUd7NGh8kApy4aqSHZ1HPHbSlWr.MqIzmBe5hlA8gbPeoSWbj 6b9OF0nQ9xB9Vv.zpPyzxDmA2apsbn5BhPPK2tfQjkU9GCGaf311j_epOoLl.HlG4_lRNqDNRIx6 6E2h97U6ez5ItKJel07DSMo5BGseAuA1frLyq6OOpQWykvu5Egop5LxESreDmSE39ytqIZnoU6kI svs9zPMoCrLcSJ4NpdZOTnjcvNuDcEnnDmRHQ0aSTxXvGzIGww.cg7o4GgUR4qoG6JvD.jIW9nwt E4muTvMdTZegbkrcZjH8hu7beNbq3Yq6JnqF_HkOaK8MwfMRtrdYfG8c5m6zxFFDmhun12KYBHSk R1IW2Zou8b4WmP3EPUzHt9bF3mPAn_GP4CR3NQFaXSZY8Exuj9J6ien8QCyyPFV0u0eN89LR7LiC EA451Fk_9iH0c8lqEIUPAiM7jJwSXcuMFxIfqSGP70GsFJ7b_u_mlZWtNco7iQUKJNBodLbXM2mx RsY_xJ4sPBtKpchd5OVWUka6LT2Z1urpByVying47BuUTuf.LvJkgKglbRTrnQ3JAGMOb.pT9.5X LHhZ1QVOd17hJLJk0btxsAr3YB1V6_U_oTFEoArk3FrJWAVZxb6oxIYYOkN4sLyHFUWSGRfuLM0x Pitirk5XZv_6fIqi3ImWMafMo.oLyVBlRJBVcaqrZRK1AtrQrrUlClBFjX7YHZ_2hy9G12p6zdFx owlhJH84tz1qEPR82IdweEuu_vlXxnSuYz7CHN6DF9RjoB2KooinqTpawxdQ63sIMiEKrVNV5oqd JKu7Cp9w2i2zRIxH8.jbdDpqGPtNcndNKBZ_.y7qFlZOXPg2Css2bRJSG3aNAt8_58qzxa5yi_yV Er9.hQS.xK5jc2DPaErDYLtWUsCeJH3bLl7d_kpxFFMcq0ClFsAbDnZTooDyFSnLSE6VVjsnP.99 qfMCIxjLB0GTkxwvUpp_Wmjf1LvuQKBCuVTbKKla6OlhFn_wQprUS5dvsWmkZ1LE.F3ambmTCgDP MXv.iky5pX75cjJKp5HWyi05z0A4CSMVubJ3m_t6yG5WnnVH0hJbCbTM.Mb8GbDWi5.SlfXvAD4q IHk8d9C2EiEkhc_0owMxzfqlsvDtc2d1PE2ZzpVwynaoH7fkMArPqM0tMbbBFPbIydrWf7KLxtUF CV7.Z09Pqmsd9RnxIP1LGmdbVdvwsneLtfK3SklySbf4FyesmVtLhxUzKgOJ.TFbAfyefGJMpENM peQ7u.0ufkjEbbxBla_KhmQLZTvSW2IbA44HddkZJRXLSVA4.FVAUEiNxHQmSgovY.3UauIwxarI I9GZFnCyd6fr7T_GC3x_.zn73mOeQRW8yCHKzJnLpuTj0vK9RXUfvwwwucU4qNkTyoNTGFPVKP1s 98_hqiDuxsThzohj8HRWbT.Ks7mwg5Q--
Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic306.consmr.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with HTTP; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:40:40 +0000
Received: by smtp419.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (Oath Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID d419e293452501d896721d4fdf8cbe1c; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:40:36 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102)
In-Reply-To: <CO2PR00MB0199854C51E2D9DC423D8486E8340@CO2PR00MB0199.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 15:40:35 -0800
Cc: "scim@ietf.org" <scim@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C82B7374-342D-4F60-B29E-01D8168D0F23@yahoo.com>
References: <CO2PR00MB0199854C51E2D9DC423D8486E8340@CO2PR00MB0199.namprd00.prod.outlook.com>
To: Mark Wahl <Mark.Wahl@microsoft.com>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/bMG5MwCm-S320ZdMh_AewBG_-4U>
Subject: Re: [scim] SCIM Soft Delete
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 23:40:53 -0000

It would help tremendously to have an interop test suite hosted by a neutral org (eg OIDF). 

A compliance suite would go a long way to identify true interop issues vs. intended restful flexibility. 

Cheers,

Phil Hunt
IndependentId

> On Jan 14, 2020, at 1:57 PM, Mark Wahl <Mark.Wahl@microsoft.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> In addition to progressing the SCIM extensions I-Ds, it may also be
> worthwhile to consider rechartering the WG in order to evaluate and
> revise the existing SCIM RFCs, addressing the criteria of section 2.2
> of RFC 6410 (ensure at least two independent interoperating 
> implementations of each feature, no errata, no unused features...), 
> to allow the underlying SCIM protocol and core schema to progress 
> towards standards status.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Mark Wahl
> Microsoft Corporation
> 
>