Re: [scim] PRECIS questions

Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@independentid.com> Wed, 09 September 2020 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <phil.hunt@independentid.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D5133A0BEB for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:59:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=independentid-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4MGn6ObwQs0R for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x436.google.com (mail-pf1-x436.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::436]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEB0A3A048A for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x436.google.com with SMTP id o68so2964228pfg.2 for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=independentid-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+UGZMf93FYdzmCHs/ShcP0x3nqwdrPohnxqm7MQ75yE=; b=wPqwTatc5gS+uk3uSETY5r3lweOM8y7+euLVnWQvAMOsTDkLG0vsm7jnBJk+6TEWRW +Lqg3Z+Wqernqz2OYRnholTXlsf+T3nGC7Rw8jwfjH10tqrBwUs8ft8/aidgm4uCAgcK rbKbtOvLdyFBftBo+lIlP81jx5LotQtqTOn66SnGvWxyaMrgzC33E03gAh0x7my8Gtjq tOAemVCkvHaN75Qw1baDBrcYA33QlQq1lPB0W8gXjnRDExdLt45YKXdVlYKBTaaYe0S1 oDmFMtg2pwIkrhTqXBPZODvZQOV1pY17wEyjdek6VxHDfQZ4IzN9vpx53kOGpr1x6Pzm xnPw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=+UGZMf93FYdzmCHs/ShcP0x3nqwdrPohnxqm7MQ75yE=; b=iGT4rAFJI2YQxnLFUMxbmcmxvgGHqlkC6CrbAvheqt3HbsWpeFIsPWE529+KdubsPP WM1NAiURCzjvsrJHeT7BJmSyEUEQZ7IQSRFT0TAG8oGXLlEn4eNoPMCChFccBmG7uFLo 8Dltn6DtV8IYB6Si+Adz89aqZgLf3+PPbwjwu+BOqaaLRzAz/NnX508YGwuqZSCTiXjY 6pCnoFzrIwRpUkxsv0o+xUP3MJBkCnHZTUtiDOPTauHnJSITPKa5kYN9VCvWXA4LcYv0 JfgQzzb67nu53wFrwjQ75qJEVnHis7gmkRotiXvjGMQjK/4MhWbe+EU8YHWJCwlcLmfG OTaA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bOMlIv5IhHHNJ3rlEud6Qw9Y8e+WGxgWVe4J8Twr2SH7pCnBu 4BGnYBP0E14xQ/i+Ub+h87HikA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyC6Hb8IkgmI7VuFlwqusIrwjMB632gy4MqJf5FBjBsO3DCXlIXEJCOTmZGKB6yACRk2M8oiQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:8544:: with SMTP id d4mr1860176plo.142.1599674387777; Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.76] (d75-156-79-23.bchsia.telus.net. [75.156.79.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y5sm3078140pge.62.2020.09.09.10.59.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Sep 2020 10:59:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@independentid.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAL051Fq9xU+ka3b=0bPMqvAHEm+dukFhLeoR+knaVg7-J+cHGg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 10:59:46 -0700
Cc: scim@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <1CA2C6F3-8D5F-4B84-B0A9-7C0695A15A80@independentid.com>
References: <CAL051Fq9xU+ka3b=0bPMqvAHEm+dukFhLeoR+knaVg7-J+cHGg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sarah Mundy <the.sarah.mundy@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/bxXe27UmaeQJitdEMJ05twUbDdI>
Subject: Re: [scim] PRECIS questions
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2020 17:59:50 -0000

Sarah,

In general when another spec is referenced, the published reference remains in existing drafts. Instead, the RFC editor marks the reference (e.g. RFC7613) as “updated" by or “obsoleted" by to let implementers know while preserving referential and historical integrity. 

IMO SCIM implementers should be looking at RFC8265 as it is more broad based than SASLprep and in my opinion more applicable to the SCIM and OAuth community.

I hadn’t gotten around to this myself, and I too would be interested in open source PRECIS library references.

Phillip Hunt
phil.hunt@independentid.com



> On Aug 31, 2020, at 8:22 AM, Sarah Mundy <the.sarah.mundy@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> A couple of questions about PRECIS string comparison for SCIM 2.0:
> 
> 1. The SCIM 2.0 spec references RFCs 7564 and 7613, which are obsolete drafts of PRECIS. Are folks instead using the final versions, RFCs 8264 and 8265?
> 
> 2. Can anyone point me to a stable, open-source library of PRECIS tools, preferably in Java? What are other server implementers using? I haven't been able to find anything but maybe I am not using the right keywords in my searches.
> 
> Thanks,
> Sarah
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim