Re: [scim] issue #28 consensus call
Chris Phillips <Chris.Phillips@canarie.ca> Thu, 11 April 2013 01:54 UTC
Return-Path: <Chris.Phillips@canarie.ca>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C1F21F8AE6 for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fduHW8fVh5NX for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.canarie.ca (mail.canarie.ca [205.189.33.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7EA121F8AB0 for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d]) by RANCOR.canarie.local ([fe80::5c7e:71ff:1ed0:916d%10]) with mapi; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:54:01 -0400
From: Chris Phillips <Chris.Phillips@canarie.ca>
To: scim WG <scim@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:53:53 -0400
Thread-Topic: [scim] issue #28 consensus call
Thread-Index: Ac42V3ArPMTJ2L+JTvaAZsEFADmTyg==
Message-ID: <CD8B8FDB.1017C5%chris.phillips@canarie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <5165B088.2010602@mnt.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.2.130206
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [scim] issue #28 consensus call
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 01:54:02 -0000
I agree with the consensus call for closing #28 as suggested in the issue tracker. C. On 13-04-10 2:33 PM, "Leif Johansson" <leifj@mnt.se> wrote: > >Folks, > >At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing >28 by including a non-normative text in the spec explaining how multi- >tenacy could be implemented. > >This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now >if you disagree. > > Leif & Morteza >_______________________________________________ >scim mailing list >scim@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim
- [scim] issue #28 consensus call Leif Johansson
- Re: [scim] issue #28 consensus call Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [scim] issue #28 consensus call Chris Phillips