[scim] [Errata Rejected] RFC7643 (6438)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 23 February 2021 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2276A3A2B71; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:58:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D1nzHwTeuEiB; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B84ED3A2B6E; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:58:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 35104F4075E; Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:58:02 -0800 (PST)
To: andrew.webb@outthink.io, phil.hunt@yahoo.com, kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com, erik.wahlstrom@nexusgroup.com, cmortimore@salesforce.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: barryleiba@computer.org, iesg@ietf.org, scim@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Message-Id: <20210223135802.35104F4075E@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 05:58:02 -0800 (PST)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/gU2EFyyELsfTkNzTvr0fpHwDssA>
Subject: [scim] [Errata Rejected] RFC7643 (6438)
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 13:58:12 -0000

The following errata report has been rejected for RFC7643,
"System for Cross-domain Identity Management: Core Schema".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6438

--------------------------------------
Status: Rejected
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Andrew Webb <andrew.webb@outthink.io>
Date Reported: 2021-02-23
Rejected by: Barry Leiba (IESG)

Section: 3.1.

Original Text
-------------
     version  The version of the resource being returned.  This value
         must be the same as the entity-tag (ETag) HTTP response header
         (see Sections 2.1 and 2.3 of [RFC7232]).  This attribute has
         "caseExact" as "true".  Service provider support for this
         attribute is optional and subject to the service provider's
         support for versioning (see Section 3.14 of [RFC7644]).  If a
         service provider provides "version" (entity-tag) for a
         representation and the generation of that entity-tag does not
         satisfy all of the characteristics of a strong validator (see
         Section 2.1 of [RFC7232]), then the origin server MUST mark the
         "version" (entity-tag) as weak by prefixing its opaque value
         with "W/" (case sensitive).

Corrected Text
--------------
     version  The version of the resource being returned.  This value
         must be the same as the entity-tag (ETag) HTTP response header
         (see Sections 2.1 and 2.3 of [RFC7232]).  This attribute has
         "caseExact" as "true".  Service provider support for this
         attribute is optional and subject to the service provider's
         support for versioning (see Section 3.14 of [RFC7644]).  If a
         service provider provides "version" (entity-tag) for a
         representation and the generation of that entity-tag does not
         satisfy all of the characteristics of a strong validator (see
         Section 2.1 of [RFC7232]), then the origin server MUST mark the
         "version" (entity-tag) as weak by prefixing its opaque value
         with "W/" (case sensitive).

Notes
-----
In the original text, the hyperlinks applied to "2.1" and "2.3" incorrectly link to those sections in RFC 7643, whereas they should link to those sections in RFC 7232.
 --VERIFIER NOTES-- 
Errata reports are for errors in the canonical version, which, for these RFCs, are the plain text versions.  HTML renderings that include heuristically-generated links aren't covered by the errata system.

--------------------------------------
RFC7643 (draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-22)
--------------------------------------
Title               : System for Cross-domain Identity Management: Core Schema
Publication Date    : September 2015
Author(s)           : P. Hunt, Ed., K. Grizzle, E. Wahlstroem, C. Mortimore
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : System for Cross-domain Identity Management
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG