[scim] $ref best practice
Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com> Mon, 26 October 2015 22:32 UTC
Return-Path: <iglazer@salesforce.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CFD91A888A for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.022
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.022 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-0.5, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BiBIL-ZaaOLl for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22f.google.com (mail-ig0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 071961A8835 for <scim@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:31:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by igbni9 with SMTP id ni9so83652569igb.1 for <scim@ietf.org>; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=salesforce.com; s=google; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=U5cInbhcoYlx6d2ZC3hGULDZUv3A7+q8jROxDATbEP0=; b=L0ldtecC7/YW9ZT3S6sozc6g61K7E6bx4rRuD5tHe9qaTrF5eUXnatTLV8RD9O0hUg 4RjVzpshS1shgnxmkkmhEmtEGYE90KSQxAmd28YVOn8Ass4xzXme9g0G2iMUd+Xx12uZ S6TMN4McUWu/Bw40pj1GhfHZdLAhs8B88r3/Y=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=U5cInbhcoYlx6d2ZC3hGULDZUv3A7+q8jROxDATbEP0=; b=hWz97+PyJ/wm+VDTlP+vlDWbyQLcAf2ehU5FbA+JM1vTgtsY6DEgQyF5NXM6It3obs SQ9lY5BDDoPQWriEnznlVJkr88tZw2/4E7bm7D4SJCG4j/nxYPXb7MJTd5qI3hzaOtxT 5c1I2s7lMxGQam63cJd+RyDJii1W98MLccRh4bzzgKa5+35gxKqGEnxQRmgnBPWzWDah i07JODznfALbebB5NA535dFVmpuBaiG1HIxisvAlmhmYMhg2y27SARq6jaPaw8ltbxDG 7enN24MFiyCe2g59tcarK/zcBUSDaJcGS7/6TSTWrGebE6fBPGntQ7foex+XGVoY05FU QRGQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkwRTBpo+SbMBPCYKd6EASd5p+Y30ecJseZdU1ms1SGnC5XCFu9fx1q8/NARtaWN3ztyz+p
X-Received: by 10.50.79.232 with SMTP id m8mr21538005igx.79.1445898717315; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:31:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.36.43.18 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Oct 2015 15:31:37 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ian Glazer <iglazer@salesforce.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 18:31:37 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOJ9JzS_CQLeUGAbB3eVuzH94fanARz5MqxEoRyNR0RbRBqU1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: "scim@ietf.org WG" <scim@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e013a06066d7ad90523098766"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/i22dGCZn7q6fgPKuG9fs-zMro5Y>
Subject: [scim] $ref best practice
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scim/>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2015 22:32:00 -0000
All - In looking at Core Schema's non-normative examples is see to patterns for $ref: 1) With complete URI such as " https://example.com/v2/Users/2819c223-7f76-453a-919d-413861904646" 2) With local reference URI such as "../Users 2819c223-7f76-453a-919d-413861904646" I don't think we provide any guidance on when two use one pattern or the other. So what is the best practice? i -- Ian Glazer Senior Director, Identity +1 202 255 3166 @iglazer <https://twitter.com/iglazer>
- [scim] $ref best practice Ian Glazer