[scim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7643 (6004)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 03 March 2020 17:17 UTC

To: phil.hunt@yahoo.com, kelly.grizzle@sailpoint.com, erik.wahlstrom@nexusgroup.com, cmortimore@salesforce.com, barryleiba@computer.org, aamelnikov@fastmail.fm, adam@nostrum.com, moransar@cisco.com, leifj@sunet.se
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: randomshelley@gmail.com, scim@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20200303171714.030FCF4071A@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 03 Mar 2020 09:17:14 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scim/l9dV6UavijqqB1Dj4bMz46coPSg>
Subject: [scim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7643 (6004)
Precedence: list

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7643,
"System for Cross-domain Identity Management: Core Schema".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid6004

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: Shelley Baker <randomshelley@gmail.com>

Section: 8.7.1

Original Text
-------------
      {
        "name" : "name",
        "type" : "complex",
        ...
        "uniqueness" : "none"
      },
      ...
      {
        "name" : "emails",
        "type" : "complex",
        ...
        "uniqueness" : "none"
      },
      ...
      {
        "name" : "addresses",
        "type" : "complex",
        ...
        "uniqueness" : "none"
      },


Corrected Text
--------------
      {
        "name" : "name",
        "type" : "complex",
        ...
      },
      ...
      {
        "name" : "emails",
        "type" : "complex",
        ...
      },
      ...
      {
        "name" : "addresses",
        "type" : "complex",
        ...
      },


Notes
-----
The "emails", "name", and "addresses" complex user attributes have a "uniqueness" characteristic defined. According to Section 2.3.8, complex attributes have no uniqueness. No other complex attributes in Section 8.7.1 specify a "uniqueness" characteristic. For compliance with Section 2.3.8 and consistency with other attribute definitions, the "uniqueness" sub-attribute for these complex attributes should be removed.

Instructions:
-------------
This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party  
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC7643 (draft-ietf-scim-core-schema-22)
--------------------------------------
Title               : System for Cross-domain Identity Management: Core Schema
Publication Date    : September 2015
Author(s)           : P. Hunt, Ed., K. Grizzle, E. Wahlstroem, C. Mortimore
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : System for Cross-domain Identity Management
Area                : Applications and Real-Time
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG

[scim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7643 (6004) RFC Errata System
Re: [scim] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7643 (6… Phil Hunt