Re: [scim] issue #29 consensus call

Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com> Wed, 10 April 2013 18:35 UTC

Return-Path: <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
X-Original-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scim@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E8C21F8FCF for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DX0XPz2WdT5k for <scim@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com (userp1040.oracle.com [156.151.31.81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1192B21F8FC7 for <scim@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ucsinet22.oracle.com (ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]) by userp1040.oracle.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1) with ESMTP id r3AIZN2C000786 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:26 GMT
Received: from aserz7022.oracle.com (aserz7022.oracle.com [141.146.126.231]) by ucsinet22.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AIZMFB005965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:23 GMT
Received: from abhmt104.oracle.com (abhmt104.oracle.com [141.146.116.56]) by aserz7022.oracle.com (8.14.4+Sun/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3AIZMMg018573; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:22 GMT
Received: from [192.168.1.8] (/24.85.226.208) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:22 -0700
References: <5165AFCB.8090502@mnt.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <5165AFCB.8090502@mnt.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <2C02D130-A427-4288-A337-89E716D0B38D@oracle.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329)
From: Phil Hunt <phil.hunt@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:35:22 -0700
To: Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se>
X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94]
Cc: scim WG <scim@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [scim] issue #29 consensus call
X-BeenThere: scim@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Simple Cloud Identity Management BOF <scim.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/scim>
List-Post: <mailto:scim@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim>, <mailto:scim-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 18:35:27 -0000

Sorry meant to say i agree with the call in Orlando. 

Phil

Sent from my phone.

On 2013-04-10, at 11:30, Leif Johansson <leifj@mnt.se> wrote:

> Folks,
> 
> At Orlando we polled the room and there was clear consensus for closing
> 29 as suggested in the issue tracker.
> 
> This email serves as a confirmation for that consensus call - speak up now
> if you disagree.
> 
>        Leif & Morteza
> _______________________________________________
> scim mailing list
> scim@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scim