[Scsn] Problem statements and a gap analysis for the SCSN

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Tue, 22 March 2016 02:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: scsn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scsn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E36612D614; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:16:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.222
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.222 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GwA2bod32bDC; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:16:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com []) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EEDC12D517; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 19:16:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (EHLO lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com) ([]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CGK67024; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 02:16:30 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA411-HUB.china.huawei.com ( by lhreml704-cah.china.huawei.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 02:16:06 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([]) by szxema411-hub.china.huawei.com ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 10:15:57 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: "scsn@ietf.org" <scsn@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Problem statements and a gap analysis for the SCSN
Thread-Index: AdGD4MEyyJAqphtfQRi3wBsnaxceNQ==
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 02:15:57 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B9167DB13@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020206.56F0AAFE.0109, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d996e9e8792beb4114374e52d6b892e3
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scsn/YDMSw17Wej4_3cjcvugUYS8P-m8>
Cc: "brian@innovationslab.net" <brian@innovationslab.net>, "detnet@ietf.org" <detnet@ietf.org>, "tictoc@ietf.org" <tictoc@ietf.org>, Karen O'Donoghue <odonoghue@isoc.org>
Subject: [Scsn] Problem statements and a gap analysis for the SCSN
X-BeenThere: scsn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Scalable Clock Synchronization Network- Discussion of Scalable Clock Synchronization Network." <scsn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scsn>, <mailto:scsn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scsn/>
List-Post: <mailto:scsn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scsn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scsn>, <mailto:scsn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 02:16:35 -0000

Hi all,

During the IETF 94th meeting, we presented "Problem Statements of Scalable Synchronization Networks" (draft-hjxl-ssn-ps-00) in the NTP/TICTOC joint session.
Brian said that more analysis is needed and a BoF may also be needed for this topic.

Thus, we updated the I-D to a new version:

And provided an initial gap analysis for the SCSN:

We hope to see more inputs to the topic and comments to these documents.

Best regards,