IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Scsn] IEEE-1588v2.1 performance monitoring

Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com> Wed, 02 March 2016 13:43 UTC

Return-Path: <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: scsn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: scsn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 668021A8905 for <scsn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 05:43:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DwiA9NtYGAMq for <scsn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 05:43:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E1C621A88EB for <scsn@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 05:43:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CFF73505; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:43:07 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.71) by lhreml403-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 13:43:06 +0000
Received: from SZXEMA506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.152]) by SZXEMA412-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.71]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:42:56 +0800
From: Jiangyuanlong <jiangyuanlong@huawei.com>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "rodney.cummings@ni.com" <rodney.cummings@ni.com>
Thread-Topic: [Scsn] IEEE-1588v2.1 performance monitoring
Thread-Index: AQHRdFeEb0+h6GZuB0+0gKvhFBmWZ59F7EMAgAA7+3A=
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:42:56 +0000
Message-ID: <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B91645C07@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <mailman.0.1456903211.11371.scsn@ietf.org> <3B0A1BED22CAD649A1B3E97BE5DDD68B91645B3F@szxema506-mbs.china.huawei.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BF742A5@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA6BF742A5@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.66.76.118]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020204.56D6EDEB.03B1, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.4.152, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: 7145210e5b13fc17861f5d2831959717
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/scsn/_T66IhUOjI2EStqlvVTjKmXvkbg>
Cc: "scsn@ietf.org" <scsn@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Scsn] IEEE-1588v2.1 performance monitoring
X-BeenThere: scsn@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Scalable Clock Synchronization Network- Discussion of Scalable Clock Synchronization Network." <scsn.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/scsn>, <mailto:scsn-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/scsn/>
List-Post: <mailto:scsn@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:scsn-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/scsn>, <mailto:scsn-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2016 13:43:14 -0000

Hi Dan,

Thanks for following up this discussion. Actually we are open to any solutions that make sense.
If sync info can be regarded as IP flow, yes, IPPM and BMWG seem to be good candidate protocols.

Cheers,
Yuanlong

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca@avaya.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 6:17 PM
> To: Jiangyuanlong; rodney.cummings@ni.com
> Cc: scsn@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Scsn] IEEE-1588v2.1 performance monitoring
> 
> Hi,
> 
> If we are considering 'a universal solution' it may be good to involve the IPPM
> and BMWG working groups as well.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scsn [mailto:scsn-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jiangyuanlong
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 9:46 AM
> > To: rodney.cummings@ni.com
> > Cc: scsn@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [Scsn] IEEE-1588v2.1 performance monitoring
> >
> > Hi Rodney,
> >
> > It is great that IEEE 1588 has begun to consider the problem in the
> > performance monitoring and diagnostics. It is definitely an important topic
> > for a large scale synchronization network.
> > One interesting problem may arise, does SyncE have the same issue? If yes,
> > do we need to consider a universal solution?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Yuanlong
> >
> >
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > Dear SCSN members,
> >
> > There is an ongoing revision to the IEEE-1588 standard in progress, which is
> > projected to be v2.1 (i.e. compatible to 1588-2008, aka 2.0). The 1588 revision
> > is still in an early draft stage, with several proposals under discussion.
> >
> > At least three proposals for 1588 v2.1 relate to the topic of performance
> > monitoring and diagnostics. Subscribers to this mailing list may be interested
> > in those proposals, so I am posting information to SCSN.
> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email