IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn

<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Mon, 22 February 2016 07:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2081A710D for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:51:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.905
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.905 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.006, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Fp3d2R2Wv9yJ for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:51:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.orange.com (relais-nor35.orange.com [80.12.70.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9CAF1A7025 for <sdn@irtf.org>; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 23:51:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from opfednr05.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.69]) by opfednr20.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 8F2A040106; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:51:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [xx.xx.31.66]) by opfednr05.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 5DC6D2006B; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:51:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::60a9:abc3:86e6:2541]) by OPEXCLILMA1.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::95e2:eb4b:3053:fabf%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0279.002; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 08:51:50 +0100
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "King, Daniel" <d.king@lancaster.ac.uk>, "'sdn@irtf.org'" <sdn@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
Thread-Index: AdFn9DuIUo0PwqaFQ9eTuQrCJfr6YwFUZXcQ
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 07:51:50 +0000
Message-ID: <787AE7BB302AE849A7480A190F8B933008CE4E99@OPEXCLILMA3.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
In-Reply-To: <65174429B5AF4C45BD0798810EC48E0A8BCB6E36@EX-0-MB2.lancs.local>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/6O96OzDoXtl-PjmYa1uTPSlhQ7Q>
Cc: "shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp" <shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 07:51:54 -0000

Dear chairs, all,

I support the adoption of the document. 

Cheers,
Med

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : sdn [mailto:sdn-bounces@irtf.org] De la part de King, Daniel
> Envoyé : lundi 15 février 2016 14:26
> À : 'sdn@irtf.org'
> Cc : shiomoto.kohei@lab.ntt.co.jp
> Objet : [Sdn] Poll for RG Adoption - draft-contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn
> 
> Greetings SDN Researchers,
> 
> At IETF 94 we had a request from the authors of "Cooperating Layered
> Architecture for SDN" to poll the Research Group for adoption of their
> document:
> 
> o If you missed their presentation at IETF 94 -
> https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/94/slides/slides-94-sdnrg-2.pdf
> o The current version of the document - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-
> contreras-sdnrg-layered-sdn-04
> 
> We would like to open a two-week adoption call the document, but
> specifically ask that a "support" or "no support" response be
> substantiated with accompanying comments discussing why the document
> should be adopted, or indeed not.
> 
> Kind Regards,
> Dan & Kohei

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email