[Sdn] Solicit for comments of the updated draft : New Version Notification for draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc-01.txt

顾 戎 <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com> Tue, 01 March 2016 03:18 UTC

Return-Path: <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com>
X-Original-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: sdn@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E7C91A9076 for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:18:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.351
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s824dNDXMa-v for <sdn@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:17:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BAY004-OMC4S8.hotmail.com (bay004-omc4s8.hotmail.com [65.54.190.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE25E1A9073 for <sdn@irtf.org>; Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:17:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.54.190.200]) by BAY004-OMC4S8.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 29 Feb 2016 19:17:57 -0800
Received: from SG2APC01FT015.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.56) by SG2APC01HT009.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.422.5; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:17:24 +0000
Received: from SG2PR02MB1120.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (10.152.250.54) by SG2APC01FT015.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.250.181) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.422.5 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:17:24 +0000
Received: from SG2PR02MB1120.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.169.53.18]) by SG2PR02MB1120.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com ([10.169.53.18]) with mapi id 15.01.0415.022; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:17:23 +0000
From: =?gb2312?B?ucsgyNY=?= <gurong_cmcc@outlook.com>
To: "sdn@irtf.org" <sdn@irtf.org>
Thread-Topic: Solicit for comments of the updated draft : New Version Notification for draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHRc2ayocIT1m9hbEKw5R6a3pWXc59D6oED
Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 03:17:22 +0000
Message-ID: <SG2PR02MB11208C0DD455BFE403CB94878BBB0@SG2PR02MB1120.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20160301030142.29196.23530.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20160301030142.29196.23530.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 25.152.250.54) smtp.mailfrom=outlook.com; irtf.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;irtf.org; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=outlook.com;
received-spf: SoftFail (protection.outlook.com: domain of transitioning outlook.com discourages use of 25.152.250.54 as permitted sender)
x-tmn: [rjMIVRcSfhuLohBGcQIJPFimAikMlzcy]
x-eopattributedmessage: 0
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:25.152.250.54; CTRY:GB; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SG2APC01HT009; H:SG2PR02MB1120.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:SoftFail; MLV:ovrnspm; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 50d55bb9-110f-4668-ada4-08d3418001f4
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(5061506196)(5061507196); SRVR:SG2APC01HT009;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015012)(82015046); SRVR:SG2APC01HT009; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SG2APC01HT009;
x-forefront-prvs: 086831DFB4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="gb2312"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Mar 2016 03:17:22.7084 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SG2APC01HT009
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 01 Mar 2016 03:17:57.0734 (UTC) FILETIME=[F3F7A060:01D17368]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/sdn/8rxmIWmlPUHDmFJrQat4UQMCdsw>
Subject: [Sdn] Solicit for comments of the updated draft : New Version Notification for draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc-01.txt
X-BeenThere: sdn@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: List to Discuss SDN Research Group in the IRTF <sdn.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/options/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/sdn/>
List-Post: <mailto:sdn@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/sdn>, <mailto:sdn-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 03:18:03 -0000

Hi, dear all.
I have updated my draft of SDN and NFV co-deployment in cloud datacenters. In this draft, the deployment of SDN network with virtual machines and bare-metal servers are introduced. As some physical servers without hypervisor exist  due to the current situation, we update the draft with bare-metal servers information

Any comments about the draft or experience about the SDN of bare-metal servers are welcomed.

Gu Rong
gurong_cmcc@outlook.com
gurong@chinamobile.com
________________________________________
发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
发送时间: 2016年3月1日 3:01
收件人: Chen Li; Rong Gu
主题: New Version Notification for draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc-01.txt

A new version of I-D, draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Rong Gu and posted to the
IETF repository.

Name:           draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc
Revision:       01
Title:          Problem statement of SDN and NFV co-deployment in cloud datacenters
Document date:  2016-02-29
Group:          Individual Submission
Pages:          12
URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc/
Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc-01
Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-gu-sdnrg-problem-statement-of-sdn-nfv-in-dc-01

Abstract:
   With the development of cloud computing technology, cloud datacenters
   have been influenced.  Co-deployment of SDN and NFV technology shows
   its distinct advantages of vitalizing network resources in providing
   VPC services and SFC services.In order to deploy SDN and NFV in cloud
   datacenters, a resolution test has been conducted.  According to the
   resolution test, SDN and NFV technology has been nearly mature for
   the commercial deployment in operators' network.  However, there are
   some key problems on network architecture, virtualized platform,
   standard interfaces, performance of SDN devices and so on to be
   working out in practical practice.




Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat